Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Review
  • Open Access

An update on inflammatory choroidal neovascularization: epidemiology, multimodal imaging, and management

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 4, 5, 6,
  • 5 and
  • 1Email author
Contributed equally
Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection20188:13

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12348-018-0155-6

  • Received: 4 January 2018
  • Accepted: 4 September 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Inflammatory choroidal neovascular membranes are challenging to diagnose and manage. A number of uveitic entities may be complicated by the development of choroidal neovascularization leading to a decrease in central visual acuity. In conditions such as punctate inner choroidopathy, development of choroidal neovascularization is extremely common and must be suspected in all cases. On the other hand, in patients with conditions such as serpiginous choroiditis, and multifocal choroiditis, it may be difficult to differentiate between inflammatory choroiditis lesions and choroidal neovascularization. Multimodal imaging analysis, including the recently introduced technology of optical coherence tomography angiography, greatly aid in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory choroidal neovascularization. Management of these neovascular membranes consists of anti-vascular growth factor agents, with or without concomitant anti-inflammatory and/or corticosteroid therapy.

Keywords

  • Inflammatory choroidal neovascularization
  • Uveitis
  • Posterior uveitis
  • Choroiditis
  • Indocyanine green angiography
  • Fluorescein angiography
  • Optical coherence tomography angiography
  • EDI-OCT

Review

Introduction

Choroidal neovascular membranes (CNV) represent the pathological growth of blood vessels and can result in loss of visual function. A diverse array of pathological processes involving the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and Bruch’s membrane may lead to the formation of CNV. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and myopia are the conditions that most commonly lead to the development of CNV, with ocular inflammation being the next most frequently implicated [13]. CNV may occur in a wide range of uveitides including both infectious and non-infectious etiologies. Notably, the incidence of CNV in posterior uveitis varies considerably depending upon the underlying pathological mechanism. For instance, the development of CNV is intricately connected to the morbidity associated with punctate inner choroidopathy (PIC) [4]. Other conditions that can be complicated by the development of CNV include multifocal choroiditis, serpiginous choroiditis, presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome (POHS), toxoplasma retinochoroiditis, and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease [5].

Inflammatory CNV (i-CNV) can occur either directly from an angiogenic stimulus mediated by local inflammation, result from a degenerative disruption in the Bruch’s membrane–RPE complex, or both [2, 6]. Neovascular buds grow through the damaged RPE–Bruch’s complex and proliferate to develop large branching vascular networks. These vessels progressively grow and leak, leading to the accumulation of fluid in the subretinal space.

The diagnosis of CNV in inflammatory eye conditions was historically challenging. Recently, the ocular imaging tools by which clinicians diagnose and manage CNV have undergone significant advances. For example, the development of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) provides a highly valuable instrument to monitor the progression of CNV. Furthermore, there has been a rapid expansion in the available treatment modalities for i-CNV. In the past, laser photocoagulation and surgical excision were the only techniques employed in the management of i-CNVs. Treatment with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections are now the mainstream in the management of i-CNVs. Other therapeutic strategies include photodynamic therapy (PDT) and corticosteroids/immunosuppressive agents (local and/or systemic) [1].

In this index review, a comprehensive overview of the epidemiology, clinical features, imaging characteristics, and management options of inflammatory choroidal neovascular membranes has been performed.

Epidemiology of inflammatory CNV

CNV is an important sequela of a wide range of ophthalmic pathologies. The most common cause of CNV in the elderly is age-related macular degeneration, while in the young, CNV is frequently identified as secondary to high myopia, hereditary disorders, angioid streaks, and inflammation [7, 8]. Given the propensity of untreated CNV to result in rapid irreversible central vision loss, the importance of characterizing risk factors for CNV and prompt diagnosis is well-recognized [5]. Indeed, central vision loss due to CNV compromises patients’ ability to participate in certain types of work, as well as other daily activities such as reading and driving [9]. Uveitis tends to affect a working age population, and thus i-CNV frequently afflicts patients during their most productive and active years [5].

Various causes of infectious and non-infectious i-CNVs have been listed in Table 1 [10].
Table 1

Various uveitic entities associated with inflammatory choroidal neovascular membranes

Non-infectious

Choroiditis

Multifocal choroiditis

Punctate inner choroidopathy

Acute multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy

Birdshot chorioretinitis

Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome

Stromal choroiditis

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome

Sympathetic ophthalmia

Panuveitis

Behcet’s disease

Sarcoidosis

Multifocal choroiditis with panuveitis

Miscellaneous

Idiopathic panuveitis

Tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis

Infectious

Bacterial

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (serpiginous choroiditis)

Protozoal

Toxoplasmosis

Viruses

West Nile virus

Rubella retinopathy

Fungi

Candida albicans

Histoplasma capsulatum (presumed ocular histoplasma syndrome)

Cryptococcus neoformans

Aspergillus fumigatus

Helminth

Toxocara

Others

Endophthalmitis

Infectious uveitis

I-CNV can be secondary to either infectious or non-infectious uveitis. Causes of infectious uveitis that result in CNV include histoplasmosis, toxoplasmosis, toxocariasis, tuberculosis, congenital rubella, and West Nile virus [1116]. Published data on the prevalence of i-CNV secondary to infectious uveitis are scarce, with case series and case reports dominating the literature. Furthermore, prevalence is likely to be geographically specific, with higher rates of presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome (POHS) reported in American and European populations and higher rates of toxoplasmosis reported in South Asia [7, 17, 18]. Table 2 summarizes the common clinical features, features of i-CNVs, and associated manifestations as reported in the literature.
Table 2

Features of inflammatory choroidal neovascularization (CNV) commonly associated with infectious uveitis

 

Presumed Ocular Histoplasmosis Syndrome (POHS) [135138]

Toxoplasmosis [88, 124, 139, 140]

Intraocular tuberculosis [20, 93, 141, 142]

West Nile virus chorioretinitis [143145]

Prevalence

Frequent; present in majority cases

Estimated between 0.3–19%

Uncommon; prevalence not known

Only few cases (< 5) reported

Location of CNV

CNV is seen at the edge of a pre-existing scar in the macular or peripapillary region

CNV typically grows close to the edge of an atrophic chorioretinal scar

CNV is typically adjacent to the healed choroidal granuloma or to a healed choroiditis scar

CNV is adjacent to chorioretinal scars

Morphology of CNV

Active lesions have a disciform appearance at the macula, with a green-gray subretinal lacy discoloration and surrounding pigment. Inactive CNV appears as a white disciform scar with fibrovascular tissue

Active CNV appears as an outer retinal lesion close to the scar with associated hemorrhages and intra- or subretinal fluid.

CNV may present as a subretinal lesion with hemorrhages and intra- or subretinal fluid. Rarely, type 1 CNV may be detected only using imaging

CNV presents as a chorioretinal lesion with subretinal fluid and area of retinal hemorrhage

Associated inflammatory lesions

The triad of POHS includes the presence of peripapillary atrophy or pigmentation, histo spots (focal round-shaped chorioretinal lesions), and absence of overlying vitritis

Recurrent disease appears as an oval or circular whitish focal area of retinochoroiditis in the periphery of old atrophic lesions; dense overlying vitritis (headlight-in-fog); perivasculitis with diffuse venous sheathing; segmental arteriolar plaques

Choroiditis may have amoeboid lesions with central healing and active margins (serpiginous choroiditis) or it may present with choroidal granulomas

There is multifocal chorioretinitis with vitritis; multiple active chorioretinal lesions have the appearance of deep, creamy lesions and are 200–1000 μm in size. Inactive lesions are partly atrophic and partly pigmented with a “target-like appearance.”

Non-infectious uveitis

The prevalence of CNV secondary to non-infectious uveitis is better defined. In a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 15,137 non-infectious uveitic eyes, Baxter and colleagues report that 2% of patients presenting with posterior or panuveitis had either active CNV or sequelae of past CNV [5]. In contrast, CNV was identified very rarely at the presentation in cases of anterior or intermediate uveitis [5]. Causes of non-infectious uveitis that result in CNV include Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada’s disease, punctate inner choroidopathy, multifocal choroiditis, geographic helicoid peripapillary choroidopathy, and acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy [1, 18]. Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease and punctate inner choroidopathy have been associated with the highest incidence of CNV among these non-infectious uveitides, with adjusted hazard ratios of 3.37 and 8.67 respectively [5]. Various common causes of non-infectious uveitides associated with i-CNV are listed in Table 3 along with their prominent characteristic features.
Table 3

Features of inflammatory choroidal neovascularization (CNV) commonly associated with non-infectious uveitis

 

Multifocal choroiditis [74, 146, 147]

Punctate inner choroidopathy (PIC) [74, 146]

Serpiginous choroiditis [148150]

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKH) [151153]

Prevalence

33–50% cases

76–100% cases

10–25% cases

9–15%

Location of CNV

Associated with inflammatory lesions in the subfoveal or extrafoveal region

Highly focal; associated with inflammatory lesions in the macula

CNV is located near chorioretinal lesions in peripapillary, subfoveal, or extrafoveal areas

Usually extrafoveal; can be subfoveal and associated with chorioretinal scar

Morphology of CNV

CNV appear as subretinal elevations and subretinal fluid with or without associated hemorrhage, closely resembling inflammatory lesions

CNV appear as subretinal elevations and subretinal fluid with or without hemorrhage, closely resembling inflammatory lesions

CNV lesions are deep with associated chorioretinal atrophy, subretinal fibrosis, and pigment clumping

CNV lesions are deep, associated with subretinal or intraretinal fluid, with hemorrhage and exudation.

Associated inflammatory lesions

Multifocal choroiditis present with minimal vitreous inflammation with multiple punched-out, white-yellow lesions (50–200 μm) in the peripapillary, mid-peripheral, and anteriorly to the equator

The lesions are characterized by multiple, small (50–300 μm in diameter), yellow or white, opaque, round lesions scattered throughout the posterior pole, rarely extending to mid-periphery; absence of vitritis

Active lesions appear as gray-white lesions that progress in a geographic manner in the posterior fundus

VKH presents with granulomatous anterior uveitis, posterior synechiae, iris nodules, and stromal atrophy; multiple pockets of subretinal fluid with exudative detachments; sunset glow fundus in the chronic disease.

Clinical features of inflammatory choroidal neovascularization

Signs and symptoms

Classically, i-CNV lesions present when the patient complains of new-onset distortion or metamorphopsia. Sometimes, it may lead to the diminution of vision or a scotoma which is unexplained by the uveitis lesion. Many lesions, especially extrafoveal i-CNVs may be asymptomatic and may be detected only by clinical examination or imaging alone. i-CNVs are usually reported with posterior or panuveitis, as well as in certain cases of intermediate uveitis. Commonly, i-CNVs are diagnosed in a patient on follow-up for uveitis, in which case the CNV lesion may be missed initially due to the presence of associated features such as inflammatory lesions, scars, and pigmentation, as well as intra- or subretinal fluid accumulation [19]. On the contrary, Invernizzi et al. [20] recently demonstrated in three cases that the detection of CNV without associated AMD features (such as drusen) led the authors to perform additional imaging, such as ICGA, which showed the presence of choroidal stromal inflammation leading to the diagnosis of presumed tubercular choroiditis.

i-CNV lesions are usually closely associated with chorioretinal lesions such as scars, lesions, or choroidal granulomas. These lesions can be subfoveal, extrafoveal, or juxtafoveal, and are highly focal. These can be associated with intra- or subretinal hemorrhages and exudation surrounding the lesion. Healed or inactive i-CNVs can result in subretinal yellow-white scars, which may be associated with fibrosis and pigmentation. The presence of intra- or subretinal fluid with i-CNV, as well as serous retinal detachment, may also represent signs of inflammation, leading to a misdiagnosis during cursory examination [1, 10, 19].

Contrasting features of i-CNV and neovascular AMD

Patients with AMD-associated CNV have certain differences compared to i-CNVs. Usually, CNVs among patients with AMD can be characterized as type 1 (subretinal), type 2 (outer retinal), or mixed based on clinical and examination (including imaging) findings [21]. A majority of i-CNVs are type 2 lesions with abnormal growth of vasculature into the outer retinal space. AMD CNVs are usually subfoveal and are associated with the presence of drusen and retinal pigment epithelial abnormalities due to the accumulation of lipofuscin material. On the other hand, the retinal pigment epithelium is often intact in individuals with i-CNV [19]. The proposed mechanism of development of i-CNV is the focal breach of the retinal pigment epithelium due to infection/inflammation leading to growth and entry of new vessels into the outer retinal space [19, 22, 23]. Since i-CNV lesions are highly focal, they may respond to fewer therapeutic interventions such as the lesser number of injections compared to AMD patients (as shown by experiences of various authors in Table 4).
Table 4

Summary of studies showing the efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in inflammatory choroidal neovascularization (studies with sample size ≥ 5 eyes)

Author (year); country

Design; sample size

Disease

Mean no of injections; agent

Mean follow-up

Efficacy outcomes

Roy et al. (2017); India [18]

Retrospective; 30 eyes (28 patients)

Idiopathic choroiditis, toxoplasmosis, panuveitis, VKH, serpiginous choroiditis

2.76; (bevacizumab, ranibizumab)

17.93 ± 14.28 months

Improvement in visual acuity in 53.3%; stabilization in 26.6%

Korol et al. (2017); Ukraine [154]

Prospective cohort; 15 eyes (14 patients)

Toxoplasmosis

1.7 (aflibercept)

12 months

Visual acuity improved from 0.36 to 0.64 (p = 0.0002)

Parodi et al. (2014); Italy [76]

Prospective; 7 eyes (7 patients)

Serpiginous choroiditis

1 injection in 12 months (bevacizumab)

12 months

Visual acuity improvement in 52% and stabilization in 57%

Mansour et al. (2012); Lebanon [155]

Retrospective; 8 eyes (8 patients)

VKH, PIC, toxoplasmosis

1.375 (bevacizumab)

5 years

Visual acuity improved (median gain of 3.8 lines)

Iannetti et al. (2013); Italy [156]

Prospective study; 8 eyes (8 patients)

Posterior uveitis

3.75 ± 1.38 (bevacizumab)

19.25 ± 6 months

Visual acuity improved from 0.27 to 0.5 (p < 0.05)

Julian et al. (2011); France [157]

Retrospective; 15 eyes (15 patients)

Multifocal choroiditis with panuveitis, ampiginous choroiditis, and others

4.25 (in 12 eyes); 3 eyes received only 1 injection (bevacizumab)

17.6 months

Visual acuity improved from 0.53 to 0.29

Cornish et al. (2011); UK [158]

Retrospective; 9 eyes (9 patients)

PIC

2.34 injections per year (bevacizumab and ranibizumab)

14.9 months

Visual acuity gain was 0.36 LogMAR units

Kramer et al. (2010); Israel [159]

Retrospective; 10 eyes (10 patients)

Multifocal choroiditis, PIC, toxoplasmosis, POHS, serpiginous choroiditis, and panuveitis

2.7 ± 2 (bevacizumab)

13 ± 8 months

Visual acuity improved from 0.87 ± 0.74 to 0.38 ± 0.63 (p = 0.005)

Lott et al. (2009); USA [160]

Retrospective; 34 eyes (30 patients)

Multifocal choroiditis, PIC, VKH, idiopathic panuveitis, sarcoidosis, serpiginous choroiditis, toxocariasis, POHS, CMV retinitis, and others

2 (bevacizumab)

7 months

At 6 months, visual acuity improved in 17% and stabilized in 33%

Doctor et al. (2009); USA [161]

Retrospective; 6 eyes (5 patients)

Idiopathic panuveitis, birdshot chorioretinopathy, sympathetic ophthalmia, VKH, and multifocal choroiditis and panuveitis

2.7 (bevacizumab)

15.3 months

Visual acuity improved in 60% of cases

Fine et al. (2009); USA [95]

Retrospective; 6 eyes (5 patients)

Multifocal choroiditis

2.3 (bevacizumab)

6 months

5/6 eyes improved to 20/30 acuity or better at 6 months

Schadlu et al. (2008); USA [87]

Retrospective; 28 eyes (28 patients)

POHS

1.8 (bevacizumab)

22.43 weeks

Visual acuity improved from 0.65 to 0.43 LogMAR units

Adan et al. (2007); Spain [162]

Retrospective; 9 eyes of 9 patients

PIC, serpiginous choroiditis, multifocal choroiditis, POHS, and birdshot chorioretinopathy

7 eyes received 1 injection (bevacizumab)

7.1 months

CNV resolved completely in 100% affected eyes

CNV choroidal neovascularization, CMV cytomegalovirus, PIC punctate inner choroidopathy, POHS presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, VKH Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada’s disease

Patients with AMD develop CNV due to various contributory factors such as inflammation, complement dysregulation, and growth factor drives such as VEGF drive. Therefore, patients with AMD require constant suppression of VEGF with multiple injections of anti-VEGF agents [24, 25]. In contrast, in patients with i-CNV, with control of inflammation, which primarily drives the development of the CNV, it may be possible that the neovascular drive is extinguished once the inflammation is adequately controlled.

In the context of AMD, various multicenter clinical trials and their extension studies have shown that these patients often require anti-VEGF therapy for several years [2630]. For instance, the SEVEN-UP study (n = 65), a multicenter, non-interventional cohort study, examined the long-term results of patients 7 years after entering the ANCHOR/MARINA trials with monthly anti-VEGF therapy. In this study, 37% eyes maintained visual acuity ≥ 20/70. Sixty-eight percent of study eyes had active exudative disease [27]. In contrast, there are no such long-term reports in patients with uveitis due to i-CNVs.

Imaging features of inflammatory choroidal neovascularization

Fluorescein angiography

Traditionally, fluorescein angiography (FA) has been widely employed in the diagnosis of CNV secondary to various pathologies such as AMD. In AMD, the patterns of CNV include classic (subretinal) or occult CNV (sub-RPE). However, on FA, it may not be possible to characterize the membranes into one of the two categories easily, and therefore, some membranes are referred to as predominantly classic or minimally classic and occult with no classic types [31]. Active CNV lesions of AMD show the leakage of the dye with early hyperfluorescence, which may appear to be from an undetermined source in the occult (type 1) CNVs.

The appearance of CNV in posterior uveitis on FA has not been as well characterized. CNV lesions on FA present with early iso- or hyperfluorescence with late leakage (Fig. 1) [32]. The presence of surrounding mild hemorrhage causing masking effect on FA may also lead to the diagnosis of CNV. However, the inflammatory retinochoroidal lesions of posterior uveitis may present with markedly similar findings making the differentiation very challenging. Active uveitic chorioretinal lesions show early isofluorescence (but mostly hypofluorescent) with late leakage. On the other hand, inactive atrophic lesions show early hypo-/isofluorescence with late staining (indicating RPE window defect) without any leakage [13]. Thus, there are very subtle differences in the appearance of FA between CNV lesions and active/inactive retinochoroidal inflammatory lesions. In the presence of extensive retinal involvement resulting in scars and pigmentary changes, which may happen in conditions like multifocal choroiditis, serpiginous choroiditis, and VKH disease, the detection of hyperfluorescence due to CNV may be very challenging.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

The detection of inflammatory choroidal neovascularization on fluorescein angiography in a patient with tubercular serpiginous-like choroiditis. Fundus photograph of the right eye shows healed choroiditis lesions in the right eye (a) and the left eye (b). Fluorescein angiography of the right eye shows early hyperfluorescent lesion in the foveal region (yellow arrowhead) (c). The late phase angiogram shows progressive hyperfluorescence of the foveal lesion suggestive of choroidal neovascularization (yellow arrowhead) with staining of the healed choroiditis lesions (d)

In summary, FA in the detection of CNV in inflammatory conditions may be inconclusive. Additional tests such as OCT and OCTA may be needed to initiate therapy for CNV lesions and a multimodal imaging approach is always recommended.

Indocyanine green angiography

Indocyanine green (ICG) angiography is an imaging technique that allows a better visualization of the choroid compared to fluorescein angiography [33]. The use of ICG angiography in uveitis permits the identification of choroidal abnormalities such as granulomas, choriocapillaris hypoperfusion, active choroiditis, and hyper-permeability [34]. Neovascular networks composing CNVs are also clearly visualized by ICG, with this technique showing better results in detecting occult lesions compared to fluorescein angiography (Fig. 2) [35].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Multimodal imaging in a case of peripapillary inflammatory choroidal neovascularization (CNV) (sea fan type). a Combined fluorescein angiography (FA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) show multiple round hypofluorescent lesions in the mid-periphery with early ill-defined hyperfluorescence on FA and area of hypocyanescence with ill-defined choroidal vessels on ICGA temporal to the optic disc. b In the late phase FA, the mid-peripheral hypofluorescent lesions become less hypofluorescent/isofluorescent. There is a progressive increase in the hyperfluorescence temporal to the optic disc on FA, suggestive of type 2 choroidal neovascularization. c Optical coherence tomography angiography en face scan shows the presence of neovascular loops of vessels which have a sea fan configuration although the feeder vessel is not apparent (yellow dashed circle). The scan has been obtained by manually segmenting the image to obtain a slab of 60 μm thickness including the outer retina and choriocapillaris to allow better delineation of the pathology. d The corresponding structural en face scan does not show any signal loss except in the areas of hard exudates. e The optical coherence tomography line scan passing through the area of CNV shows the presence of a hyper-reflective lesion in the outer retina in the peripapillary region suggestive of type 2 CNV associated with retinal thickening and intraretinal cystoid spaces

I-CNVs are mainly represented by classic lesions and are usually clearly visualized by fluorescein angiography [1, 32]. However, a recent study on idiopathic CNVs which share several clinical features with i-CNVs showed that ICG was more accurate than fluorescein angiography in evaluating the size of the neovascular lesions. Furthermore, a reduction of more than 33% in the size of the CNV, measured by ICG angiography 2 months after initiating the treatment, was associated with a favorable outcome [36]. In select cases, ICG angiography can be used to augment the evaluation and follow-up of i-CNVs, identifying possible occult components and allowing these lesions to be differentiated from recurrent inflammatory lesions [37].

In summary, ICG helps to identify both i-CNVs and their associated choroidal alterations in patients with uveitis, thereby allowing a more comprehensive evaluation of the disease.

Optical coherence tomography

The introduction of optical coherence tomography (OCT) into clinical practice has profoundly impacted the management of retinal and choroidal diseases. This technique allows clinicians to obtain quasi-histological sections of the ocular structure in a non-invasive and highly repeatable way [38]. For this reason, OCT permits the evaluation of pathological changes of ocular structures and provides a means of assessing responses to treatment. A development of the OCT technique, the “enhanced depth imaging” (EDI) modality, can be used to evaluate choroidal thickness and structural modifications and is particularly useful in the management of uveitis [39].

I-CNV usually develops between the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and the neurosensory retina, with imaging features comparable to those of classic (type 2) CNVs [1, 18, 40]. On OCT images, these lesions appear as hyper-reflective structures anterior to a disrupted RPE, with solid tissue visualized in the subretinal space (Figs. 2 and 3) [40, 41]. One distinctive OCT feature of i-CNV that helps to distinguish these cases from other type 2 CNVs is the “pitchfork sign.” This sign describes finger-like hyper-reflective projections extending from the CNV area into the outer retinal layers [42]. In a fraction of those cases of CNV as a sequela of uveitis, an occult component of the membrane can be present, appearing as a pigmented epithelial detachment with mixed content [18].
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Multimodal imaging of inflammatory choroidal neovascularization (CNV) (medusa head appearance) in a case of multifocal choroiditis. a The optical coherence tomography line scan passing through the fovea shows a hyper-reflective lesion in the outer retina with the presence of mild subretinal fluid suggestive of a type 2 CNV. b, c Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) en face 3 × 3 mm scan (along with structural en face OCT scan) confirms the presence of a CNV lesion with a medusa head appearance. Similar to Fig. 2, manual segmentation of the scan has been performed to obtain a slab of 60 μm thickness including the outer retina and choriocapillaris to allow better delineation of the CNV. d The OCT line scan at 8-month follow-up after one injection of intravitreal ranibizumab shows the persistence of outer retinal hyper-reflectivity but resolution of subretinal fluid. e, f At this visit, the OCTA en face scan (with corresponding structural en face scan) shows a decrease in the size of the CNV lesion along with a decrease in vessel caliber and branching

On OCT scans, the activity of CNV is associated with signs of exudation such as retinal thickening, subretinal fluid, intraretinal fluid, intraretinal flecks, and low reflectivity or undefined boundaries of the subretinal material (Fig. 2) [41, 43]. The presence of these features correlate with the leakage on fluorescein angiography and can be used to monitor CNV progression and response to therapy [43]. In a more simplistic approach (and due to the need for quantitative measurements), the central retinal thickness measured on OCT is often used as an objective measure for i-CNV activity [44, 45].

Finally, several uveitides are characterized by the presence of non-neovascular alterations occurring at the level of the RPE, which induce changes in the retina and the choroid. OCT images can help in differentiating such chorioretinal lesions from i-CNVs. In multifocal choroiditis, for instance, acute inflammatory foci are characterized by deeper penetration of the OCT signal underneath the lesion. This sign is usually absent in i-CNV [46, 47]. However, it must be noted that distinguishing CNV lesions from inflammatory non-CNV lesions may be challenging on OCT. Inflammatory chorioretinal lesions may present with very similar features of outer retinal/RPE hyper-reflectivity, intra-retinal edema, sub-RPE fluid, and exudation. Such findings are common in conditions such as MFC, PIC, TB SLC, and other conditions with RPE/choriocapillaris involvement. In such situations, a combination of imaging tools such as FA and ICGA, as well as OCTA, may be useful in determining the characteristics of the lesions [48].

Optical coherence tomography angiography

Principle and algorithms of optical coherence tomography angiography

The development of OCTA has revolutionized the study of pathogenesis, staging, diagnosis, and management of CNV lesions in various ocular conditions, especially AMD. OCTA helps in the reconstruction of retinochoroidal microvascular network by using endoluminal flow as contrast non-invasively [49]. The development of OCTA has added a new dimension of functional vascular network imaging to the existing capabilities of OCT allowing it to image end-arterial system without the need of a dye injection [50]. The OCTA devices commercially available consist of various image processing algorithms. The most commonly used algorithms include the following: (1) complex signal-based OCTs, such optical microangiography (OMAG) (Zeiss Angioplex ®, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Dublin, CA); (2) amplitude-based OCT signal, e.g., amplitude decorrelation (Optovue AngioVue ®, Optovue, Inc., Fremont, CA); and (3) speckle and phase variance. Each algorithm has its own advantages and limitations [51, 52]. With advancing technology, there have been significant improvements in the OCTA processing software. It is expected that new algorithms that combine merits of various methods will become available to achieve better image quality in the future. Presently, none of the available algorithms are perfectly designed to identify the retinochoroidal layers by automatic segmentation in all the patients without any errors. In the context of uveitis, automatic segmentation is even more challenging due to the abnormalities involving the chorioretinal layers resulting from scarring, choroiditis, intraretinal/subretinal fluid, and other pigmentary changes [53, 54]. Therefore, caution must be exercised while interpreting the OCTA images in the clinics. It is best to manually correct the segmentation and assess the structural en face images to avoid false interpretation due to artifacts such as shadowing and projection artifacts, among others.

To overcome the inherent limitations of OCTA, modern techniques such as machine learning algorithms can enable more sophisticated image analyses and interpretation. For instance, machine learning algorithms can allow identification of CNV by automated segmentation, improving the accuracy of detection, permitting quantification, and delineating the boundaries of the lesion [55]. In the future, such techniques may be employed in the diagnosis of i-CNV.

Utility of optical coherence tomography angiography in age-related macular degeneration

Because of its utility, OCTA is very useful in the assessment of neovascular networks in neovascular AMD. Jia et al. first reported that OCTA was able to detect and quantify CNV in five eyes with AMD [56]. In a study by De Carlo et al., the sensitivity of 50% (4 of 8) and specificity of 91% (20 of 22) was observed when OCTA was compared to FA in their ability to detect CNV [57]. This relatively low sensitivity was attributed to the small sample size and presence of large retinal hemorrhages. OCTA is capable of detecting type 1, type 2, and type 3 CNV lesions in AMD [58, 59]. Various studies have compared the sensitivity and specificity of OCTA with conventional dye-based angiographies in detecting CNV. The sensitivities range from 50 to 87%, and specificities range from 91 to 100% [6064].

OCTA is also useful in determining the characteristic microvascular details of the CNV complex in AMD. This allows detailed analyses such as quantification of the area, evaluation of the branching pattern, and detection of novel measures of CNV activity such as fractal analysis [65, 66]. Morphological pattern analysis of CNV on OCTA has allowed identification of two major categories: (1) sea fan configuration with densely packed networks and capillary sprouts; and (2) medusa head pattern with large diameter vessels sprouting from a central vessel. OCTA has been shown to be useful in the determination of biological markers of activity of the CNV lesion, i.e., the presence of features such as perilesional halo, increased complexity of branching and capillary sprouts, and alteration of choriocapillaris flow at the margins are indicators of an active lesion [66, 67]. On the other hand, lesions with large trunk vessels with minimal branching indicate residual inactive networks in AMD which may not require therapy.

In AMD, OCTA has enabled identification of CNV lesions that are non-exudative and asymptomatic, i.e., treatment-naïve nascent lesions which can progress to exudation and development of larger CNV lesions [68, 69]. Thus, OCTA can permit early identification of these CNV lesions in AMD, potentially enabling the clinician to initiate early therapy. Lastly, OCTA also provides documentation of vascular remodeling and aids in the understanding of the biological behavior of CNV networks in AMD [70]. This can provide insights into the pathogenesis of the disease.

In summary, OCTA has found innumerable applications in the assessment of CNV in AMD over the past few years. The technology of OCTA in AMD is still evolving and holds promise in improving the outcomes in these patients.

Optical coherence tomography angiography in the detection of inflammatory choroidal neovascularization

Compared to neovascular AMD, the applicability, usefulness, and limitations of OCTA in the evaluation of i-CNV need to be explored in various areas. Similar to neovascular AMD, OCTA can allow precise delineation of i-CNV lesions in patients with uveitis. A number of authors have shown the utility of OCTA as a non-invasive modality in the detection of CNV.

In a study by Cheng et al., the ability to detect CNV and differentiate it from the inflammatory lesions on OCTA was assessed. In this series, 26 patients with a diagnosis of multifocal choroiditis were evaluated using OCTA and conventional FA [71]. Using FA, active type 2 CNV networks were identified in all the eyes. These findings were also corroborated using OCTA. On OCTA, three eyes had severe motion artifacts limiting the findings. The authors concluded that OCTA has an advantage of differentiating i-CNV lesions from inflammatory lesions as these do not show any blood flow signals [71]. Similarly, in a recent series by Zahid et al. [72], neovascular flow signals were evaluated using OCTA in 14 patients with multifocal choroiditis. Yee et al. demonstrated that OCTA allows non-invasive diagnostic imaging of i-CNV and its follow-up after therapy [73]. Thus, there are various case reports in which OCTA has been used to detect neovascular flow lesions. OCTA allows non-invasive i-CNV detection in punctate inner choroidopathy [74], multifocal choroiditis [46] and other white dot syndromes [75], serpiginous choroiditis [76], cat-scratch disease [77], and TB-associated choroiditis [73]. In most of these published studies, OCTA has been used to confirm the presence of i-CNV networks in uveitis and demonstrate the neovascular regression following therapeutic intervention.

As mentioned earlier in the study by Cheng et al. [71], OCTA particularly has an advantage over FA in distinguishing neovascular lesions from inflammatory lesions. In a series of 13 patients (18 eyes) by Astroz et al. [48], patients with multifocal choroiditis were evaluated using various imaging tools to characterize inflammatory and i-CNV lesions. The authors showed in their results that on OCTA, i-CNV showed abnormal blood flow in almost all eyes and also in two lesions previously diagnosed as inflammatory lesions. Compared to other imaging techniques, OCTA allowed a diagnosis of i-CNV in additional 14% cases misdiagnosed as inflammatory lesions on other tools such as FA and OCT [48].

Certain published case reports have demonstrated distinct advantages of OCTA over conventional FA and OCT in the detection of i-CNV, especially when the FA and OCT are inconclusive. In a case report, Nozaki et al. evaluated a patient of multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS) and i-CNV using conventional FA, OCT, and OCTA [75]. The authors observed that FA showed significant leakage and pooling of dye due to macular edema and serous retinal detachment. Similarly, the OCT was inconclusive. It was only through OCTA that the authors were able to observe a neovascular complex and diagnose the presence of an i-CNV [75]. Similarly, Baumal et al. demonstrated in a young female patient with multifocal choroiditis that OCTA can be useful in confirming the presence of an i-CNV when the conventional dye-based FA and SD-OCT was inconclusive [78]. Levinson studied a larger cohort of 12 patients with PIC and multifocal choroiditis of which 17 eyes had suspected i-CNV lesions. In this study, the authors were able to identify i-CNV in 15 eyes of 11 patients as a neovascular network in choriocapillaris/outer retinal layer. Among the seven eyes that underwent FA imaging, i-CNV was detected in only four eyes using FA as an abnormal staining (but no clear-cut vessels were visible) [74]. Another case report by Nakao et al. of a patient with PIC showed the superiority of OCTA in detecting i-CNV where FA showed only staining and possible leakage but was inconclusive [79].

Aggarwal et al. recently studied OCTA features of TB-associated choroiditis and compared the findings to conventional imaging including FA, ICGA, and OCT. The study showed that OCTA, for the first time, was able to identify type 1 neovascular networks in TB choroiditis [80]. In this study, the authors showed that findings were inconclusive on FA with only an ill-defined hyperfluorescence in the late phase. ICGA also showed only subtle ill-defined hyper-cyanescence that did not confirm the presence of i-CNV. OCT showed only low-lying pigment epithelial detachments but no intra- or subretinal fluid. Thus, the manuscript concluded that without OCTA, it is impossible to rule out neovascular networks when FA, ICGA, and OCT are inconclusive [80]. In addition, the presence of associated pathologies such as chorioretinal scarring, choroiditis, and chorioretinal lesions may make it difficult to identify i-CNV among patients with posterior uveitis [3]. Thus, the use of OCTA provides objective evidence of the presence of CNV lesions and greatly aids in the decision-making for the use of anti-VEGF agents (Figs. 2 and 3).

Future directions of optical coherence tomography angiography

Studies with larger sample sizes and prospective methodologies are needed to determine the benefits of OCTA over conventional imaging such as FA, ICGA, and OCT in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Unlike in AMD, quantitative analysis of i-CNV lesions (such as area analysis, lesion size, vessel density analysis, and fractal dimension analysis) have not been performed thus far. Further studies are required that enable better correlation of FA, ICGA, and OCT with OCTA especially in missed cases of i-CNV so that the detection and treatment rates can be improved. While evidence does show that OCTA may have several advantages over conventional imaging, its disadvantages such as motion artifacts, inaccurate segmentation, and projection artifacts need to be addressed. Studies that determine whether OCTA is able to detect i-CNV lesions early and result in better visual outcomes need to be planned in the future.

Near-infrared autofluorescence imaging

The technique of near-infrared autofluorescence (NIR AF) using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) system has been employed in the study of various retinal diseases. NIR AF originates from the melanin of the RPE and has applicability in various conditions such as AMD and CNV due to various causes [8185]. Among patients with neovascular AMD, NIR AF often shows signal blockade due to subretinal hemorrhage due to CNV. NIR AF signal may be decreased in areas of exudation around the CNV. NIR AF also allows adequate visualization of associated drusen in AMD CNV [85]. On the contrary, i-CNVs may show a different pattern on NIR AF imaging, potentially allowing differentiation between inflammatory lesions and neovascular membranes. NIR AF of active lesions may show increased AF signal, whereas the i-CNV may appear black/grayish with patchy AF signal [71]. Future studies are needed to further characterize the appearance of inflammatory and i-CNV lesions on NIR AF and explore whether this tool can be used to differentiate between CNV related to AMD and other causes.

Management of inflammatory choroidal neovascularization

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy

Mechanism of action

The development of anti-angiogenic therapies based on the current understanding of the molecular events in CNV has helped overcome a barrier the management of CNV. Anti-VEGF drugs pharmacologically target two crucial pathological changes induced by VEGF: permeability and angiogenesis.

Anti-VEGF therapy for AMD

Large multicenter randomized controlled trials such as MARINA, ANCHOR, and others have conclusively established the role of serial anti-VEGF injections in AMD [28, 29, 86]. Anti-VEGF therapy is, therefore, the treatment of choice for CNV secondary to AMD. Multiple studies have also demonstrated the utility of anti-VEGF treatment in the management of CNV secondary to other inflammatory etiologies. It is imperative to note however that unlike AMD, in i-CNV, there are no randomized controlled trials (with double masking and comparison to sham/alternate therapies) testing the efficacy of anti-VEGF agents in the resolution of the CNV or improving visual acuity. There are several reasons for this, including the rarity of the CNV occurrence and heterogenous patient profile in terms of disease manifestations, need for concomitant anti-inflammatory therapy, and challenges in the diagnosis.

Efficacy of anti-VEGF in i-CNV

Anti-VEGF therapies have been used for the management of i-CNVs associated with both infectious and non-infectious uveitic entities. There are several case reports and case series documenting successful resolution of i-CNV following anti-VEGF therapy, with or without concomitant anti-inflammatory (either corticosteroid and/or immunosuppressive therapy). Table 4 provides details of various relevant studies on the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy for i-CNV.

Role in infectious uveitis

Among patients with POHS, intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents have been successfully used to treat CNV. A retrospective case series of 28 patients presenting either juxta- or subfoveal CNV related to POHS has demonstrated that intravitreal bevacizumab leads to visual acuity improvement in 71% eyes and a stabilization in 14% of cases over an average follow-up of 22 weeks [87]. Similarly, in ocular toxoplasmosis, Ben Yahia et al. [88] have reported the effective use of bevacizumab in the successful treatment of CNV due to ocular toxoplasmosis in two patients. Shah et al. [89] reported clinical improvement in the treatment of CNV secondary to ocular toxoplasmosis with a single administration of ranibizumab in a patient. A few cases of CNV associated with ocular toxocariasis have been managed with anti-VEGF agents. Lyall et al. [90] reported a case of ocular toxocariasis with CNV treated with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab. Yoon et al. [91] have reported a similar case of toxocariasis with CNV treated with intravitreal ranibizumab and bevacizumab injections combined with oral albendazole. Julian et al. [92] conducted a study involving 15 patients diagnosed with CNV secondary to uveitis, including one patient with tuberculous uveitis. All the patients received intravitreal bevacizumab injections for the treatment of CNV lesions. At 17-month follow-up, nearly 80% of eyes showed significant improvement in visual acuity and macular thickness after a mean 4.25 injections. Kim et al. [93] reported a case series of patients with active CNV as a result of tuberculous chorioretinitis. The patients had a notable improvement in their clinical course with the retention of their baseline visual acuity.

Role in non-infectious uveitis

Anti-VEGF therapies are also very efficacious in the management of CNV associated with non-infectious uveitis. Wu et al. [94] reported successful outcomes of intravitreal injections of bevacizumab for CNV associated with VKH disease in two patients. Fine et al. [95] have reported the outcome of bevacizumab and ranibizumab intravitreal injections in 6 eyes affected by CNV secondary to multifocal choroiditis. The results at the end of follow-up (mean follow-up 42 weeks, range 25–69 weeks) showed an improvement of visual acuity values better than 20/30 and reduced activity of CNV lesion in 5 eyes. Another retrospective study analyzed the efficacy of bevacizumab administered for CNV not related to age-related macular degeneration. This study included 12 eyes affected by multifocal choroiditis [96]. Similarly, a recent case report has described a favorable outcome after treatment of CNV associated with serpiginous choroiditis with intravitreal injection of ranibizumab [97]. While CNV is rarely associated with acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE), a single case report recently describes a 14-year-old girl who developed CNV associated who was effectively treated with a single intravitreal ranibizumab injection with improvement in visual acuity from 20/40 to 20/20 through a follow-up of 12 months along with the stabilization of the CNV [98].

Thus, anti-VEGF agents form the first-line therapy for CNV lesions associated with ocular inflammation and have been used to treat active CNV lesions in various infectious as well as non-infectious uveitic entities.

Corticosteroid therapy

Mechanism of action

Corticosteroids have been used for decades and still represent the commonest choice in the treatment of uveitis due to their strong and rapid anti-inflammatory effects [99]. In addition to the inhibition of pro-inflammatory factors, transcription and the suppression of prostaglandin and interleukin synthesis, corticosteroids interfere with the effects of VEGF [100, 101]. Reducing the VEGF stimulus to the growth of new vessels and decreasing inflammation, the primary cause for VEGF release, these drugs remain a valuable option for the treatment of i-CNVs.

Role of oral corticosteroids

Before anti-VEGF agents became available, corticosteroid therapy was the only medical option for the treatment of CNVs [102]. Patients were usually treated with a course of 1 mg/kg/day of oral corticosteroid for approximately 7 days followed by slow tapering. With this approach, several authors reported stabilization of visual acuity in more than 80% of the patients affected by subfoveal i-CNVs [2, 102]. High-dose systemic corticosteroids can control ocular inflammation as well as the stabilization of i-CNV lesions in patients with posterior uveitis.

Local and intravitreal corticosteroids

High-dose systemic corticosteroids are limited by their adverse effect profile. Martidis et al. conducted a study comparing high-dose (1 mg/kg) oral prednisolone and a single sub-Tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide for subfoveal i-CNV due to POHS [102]. In this study, oral prednisone resulted in a short-term improvement in visual acuity, which stabilized over longer follow-up. Sub-Tenon’s triamcinolone group achieved similar final stabilization without the initial improvement. Rechtman et al. also evaluated the use of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in ten patients with POHS [103]. Thirty percent patients showed improvement, whereas 50% showed stabilization in visual acuity. Intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®) has not been employed in the management of i-CNV yet.

Combination therapies with corticosteroids

Local [104] or systemic [105, 106] steroid treatment have been combined with photodynamic therapy (PDT), allowing for a decrease in the number of PDT sessions and, for the first time, to achieve an improvement in visual acuity. Intravitreal corticosteroids (triamcinolone acetonide) has been combined with bevacizumab for recurrent i-CNV in VKH disease in a case report by Pai et al. [107] The authors demonstrated complete resolution of i-CNV and ocular inflammation after combined therapy and systemic steroids until 1 year after follow-up.

When VEGF agents demonstrated favorable results in patients affected by i-CNV (both in terms of visual outcomes and their side-effect profile) [45], the use of corticosteroids alone or associated with PDT for the treatment of this condition has gradually decreased. Despite this, with inflammation being the primary trigger for VEGF increase and consequent CNV development in uveitis, corticosteroids are still considered a valuable option in the management of these conditions.

Limitations of the use of corticosteroids

There are currently no data available from randomized controlled clinical trials comparing the efficacy of anti-VEGF agents alone versus corticosteroids alone or as a combined therapy. A proper guideline on the use of corticosteroids in i-CNVs is conspicuously absent. In the face of uncertainty, the wisest approach seems to be to control the inflammatory stimulus by the use of systemic steroids [1] while simultaneously treating the neovascular component with intravitreal injections of anti-VEGFs [19].

Immunosuppressive therapy

Pre-clinical evidence and mechanism of action

Various corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents have been used as an off-label therapy in patients with uveitis. As discussed in the preceding sections, most cases with uveitis and i-CNVs are managed using systemic/local corticosteroids and anti-VEGF injections. However, there are situations where corticosteroids may be relatively contraindicated, such as patients with impaired steroid responsiveness or patients with a history of severe systemic/ocular corticosteroid-related adverse events. Immunosuppressive agents, by the virtue of their anti-inflammatory action, can curb angiogenesis and therefore limit the development of CNV.

In an experimental study of laser-induced CNV in mice, the role of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α receptors was evaluated [108]. CNV was induced in TNF-α receptor 1a and 1b (−/−) mice and the expression of TNF-α in the RPE, and the choroid was determined using western blot analysis. In this experiment, it was observed that TNF-α levels were elevated in the chorioretinal tissue in mice with CNV. The absence of TNF-α receptors increased endothelial cell apoptosis and led to a reduced inflammatory cellular response [108]. This experiment provides a preclinical evidence of the use of anti-TNF-α agents in the management of i-CNV. In a murine model of laser-induced i-CNVs, the anti-TNF-α agents (etanercept and infliximab) were shown to be effective in decreasing the CNV size and leakage on fluorescein angiography compared to the control group [109]. These experiments support the role of immunosuppressive agents such as TNF-α in the management of i-CNVs. At optimal doses, intravitreal injection of infliximab (an anti-TNF-α agent) in experimentally induced CNV has been demonstrated to reduce the area of CNV and decrease the levels of VEGF (by ELISA and immunofluorescence testing) without any cytotoxic effects on the RPE [110].

Systemic immunosuppressive therapy

Systemic immunosuppressive therapy can result in resolution of i-CNV. A case report published in 1998 by Kilmartin et al. demonstrates a case of a 3-year-old boy with sympathetic ophthalmia who developed i-CNV resulting in the worsening of visual acuity. Systemic cyclosporin resulted in the stabilization of the lesion with resolution of associated edema and hemorrhage [111]. In a series by Dees et al., 14 patients (17 eyes) with i-CNV and posterior uveitis were enrolled, of which 3 had extrafoveal CNV, 6 had juxtafoveal CNV, and 8 had subfoveal CNV. Of the 11 patients that received systemic immunosuppressive therapy with agents such as cyclosporin, CNV resolved in most eyes [112]. Neri et al. performed a prospective open-label interventional study evaluating the efficacy of systemic corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil for controlling juxta/sub-foveal i-CNV, unresponsive to traditional immunosuppressive therapy. Of the 12 eyes (9 patients), all patients showed stable or reduced lesion size at 12 months [113]. Ganesh et al. studied a large series of 49 eyes (43 patients) with i-CNV. The authors managed 17 eyes with systemic immunosuppressive therapy with favorable results [114].

Immunosuppressive therapy may also be combined with other forms of therapy such as PDT. In a retrospective study by Hogan et al., of the 6 patients, 2 with subfoveal i-CNV were treated with systemic immunosuppression (oral mycophenolate mofetil). This approach was effective in decreasing the fluorescein angiographic leakage from i-CNVs. The authors showed that combination PDT and systemic immunosuppression was a useful therapeutic option [115]. Systemic methotrexate has also been used in combination with intravitreal ranibizumab in a patient with VKH disease complicated by i-CNV [116].

Intravitreal immunosuppressive agents

Intravitreal injections of immunosuppressive agents may also be employed in the management of i-CNV. Agents such as intravitreal methotrexate may have a role in the management of i-CNV as shown by Mateo-Montoya et al. In this manuscript, the authors describe a case of a 25-year-old lady with multifocal choroiditis with i-CNV who had received three prior injections of intravitreal ranibizumab. The authors treated this patient with intravitreal methotrexate (single injection) with improvement in visual acuity and no recurrence of CNV lesion at 20 months follow-up [117]. While there are very few such published reports, we have had success in treating i-CNV with intravitreal methotrexate, in patients who either cannot tolerate or afford other forms of therapy.

Advantages and limitations of the use of immunosuppressive agents

Knowledge of the use of immunosuppressive agents for i-CNVs is increasing with passing time. However, there are no clear guidelines on the use of these agents, nor on the choice of agents for managing i-CNVs. The exact mechanisms by which immunosuppressive therapies act on the CNV is not yet clear. Therefore, further studies that evaluate the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapies (systemic and/or local) that highlight the choice of the agent, timing and number of injections, and outcome measures are necessary.

Since there are no guidelines on the use of anti-VEGF, corticosteroid or immunosuppressive therapies for i-CNV, a randomized clinical trial is necessary. In the context of uveitic macular edema, where a similar dilemma exists, the National Eye Institute (NEI) is currently recruiting patients in a multicenter clinical trial, Macular Edema Ranibizumab versus Intravitreal Anti-inflammatory Therapy Trial (MERIT), to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of intravitreal methotrexate, intravitreal ranibizumab, and the intravitreal dexamethasone implant [118]. A similar approach is needed for the management of i-CNVs.

Other therapeutic strategies

Other various therapeutic strategies have been used in the literature in the management of i-CNVs. These have been summarized in the following sections.

Photodynamic therapy

As mentioned in the preceding sections, PDT has been variably used in the management of CNV associated with uveitis, often combining it with anti-VEGF therapy or corticosteroids. The consensus of the use of PDT alone is that it can stabilize but can rarely improve the visual acuity. PDT with verteporfin has been used in the monotherapy of CNV associated with serpiginous choroiditis, POHS, and PIC [119121]. In a prospective pilot study of 19 patients with i-CNV, standard PDT with verteporfin was performed for patients with diagnoses of PIC, POHS, and multifocal choroiditis. The authors suggested that PDT may perform better in CNV due to ocular inflammation compared to AMD over a period of 1 year [122]. However, the exact reasons for this is not clear.

Long-term results of PDT have been extensively studied in CNV lesions occurring in association with toxoplasma retinochoroiditis. In a study of 8 patients, classic or predominantly classic CNV was treated using PDT. Persistent CNV regression was achieved in all the patients at 2 years [123]. Neri et al. evaluated the long-term (4-year) outcome of PDT in CNV lesions associated with toxoplasmosis in 9 patients. The authors observed stable/improved visual acuity and stabilized CNV diameters after PDT at 4 years’ follow-up [124]. In other case reports, PDT has been combined with either bevacizumab or with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of CNV associated with toxoplasmosis [125, 126].

PDT has also been employed in the management of CNV lesions associated with other pathologies such as VKH disease [127, 128]. Nowilaty et al. performed PDT in six eyes of 6 patients with VKH disease who developed CNV. Three eyes showed the development of submacular fibrosis. All the eyes showed stabilization of visual acuity and CNV lesions [127]. However, in another case report, retinal pigment epithelial alterations raised concerns following PDT for CNV associated with VKH disease [128].

Among patients with multifocal choroiditis, PDT has been performed either as a monotherapy [129] or in combination with immunosuppression [115] or anti-VEGF agents [130]. In all these series, PDT was associated with stabilization of CNV and visual acuity. In summary, PDT is rarely used as monotherapy for managing i-CNV in the present times.

Surgical excision

Surgical excision of CNV lesions was a historical treatment modality that has gone out of favor in the modern era. This treatment option was selected by ophthalmologists when the sole alternative therapy was laser photocoagulation, which often resulted in visual loss. In a series of 43 eyes of 40 patients with CNV not to related AMD by Benson et al., surgical excision of the subfoveal CNV lesions was performed. In this series, 79% patients showed either improved or unchanged visual acuity following surgery. Recurrence of CNV was noted in 23% eyes for whom repeat surgery was performed [131]. CNV lesions in toxoplasma retinochoroiditis [132] and candida endophthalmitis [133, 134] have been also treated using submacular surgery.

In the era of anti-VEGF therapy, submacular surgery has not found popularity. Thus, this treatment option is no longer preferred and very rarely, if ever, employed in present-day clinical practice.

Conclusions

The detection of CNV is challenging in patients with uveitis due to the difficulties of visualizing the lesion amidst choroiditis lesions, scarring, and pigmentation. Based on various case reports and series evaluating patients of posterior uveitis with suspected i-CNV, it can be concluded that OCTA in conjunction with FA, ICGA, and OCT can help in improved detection of CNV lesions, especially in cases where conventional imaging is inconclusive. OCTA can also be used to non-invasively follow-up such lesions. Importantly, there should be a high index of suspicion for identifying neovascular flow lesions that may be considered to be inflammatory lesions on examination and conventional imaging. Interpretation of OCTA requires careful review of the images to exclude any image artifacts and incorrect segmentation errors. Since the current OCTA are first generation devices, further improvement in technology may advance our imaging capabilities. As shown in various reports, OCTA is a very useful modality in the diagnosis and follow-up of i-CNV lesions, and further studies may help evaluate its role in determining the endpoint for treatment.

FA and ICGA, the two gold standard dye-based angiographic techniques, provide significant information regarding the retinochoroidal pathology in uveitis, including the level and severity of inflammation, presence of focal lesions, and vascular changes including neovascularization. OCTA appears to provide certain advantages over these existing tools in the detection of neovascular flow lesions in uveitis but certainly does not replace the information provided by the other imaging tools in the present times. Thus, while OCTA is a promising and exciting tool, significant advancements in the technology are needed to establish its role in the practice of uveitis and ocular inflammation.

Many treatment modalities are available in the management of i-CNV associated with uveitis. The general principle of treatment is to limit the inflammatory response with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressive agents. If the inflammation is unilateral, local therapies such as intravitreal dexamethasone implant, methotrexate, or triamcinolone acetonide can be considered, which can also help to reduce the size of the CNV lesion. Anti-VEGF agents are highly efficacious and are usually employed as the first-line agents for treating CNV associated with uveitis, keeping in mind that the inflammation needs to be controlled for the best outcome and reduction of recurrences. PDT is uncommonly used in the anti-VEGF era due to its limitations in improving visual acuity and potential adverse effects. In the future, novel anti-inflammatory agents and immunosuppressive agents, including intravitreal injections, may become available for the management of i-CNV.

Notes

Abbreviations

AMD: 

Age-related macular degeneration

APMPPE: 

Acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy

CNV: 

Choroidal neovascularization

EDI: 

Enhanced depth imaging

FA: 

Fluorescein angiography

ICG: 

Indocyanine green

KP: 

Keratic precipitates

MSC: 

Multifocal serpiginoid choroiditis

OCT: 

Optical coherence tomography

OCTA: 

Optical coherence tomography angiography

PDT: 

Photodynamic therapy

PIC: 

Punctate inner choroidopathy

POHS: 

Presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome

RPE: 

Retinal pigment epithelium

TB: 

Tuberculosis

TNF: 

Tumor necrosis factor

VEGF: 

Vascular endothelial growth factor

VKH: 

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada

WNV: 

West Nile virus

Declarations

Availability of data and materials

Since this is a review article, there are no data repositories for this manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

Authors AA, AI, KA, WF, RBS, and SH contributed to various sections of the manuscript. The idea was conceived by AA, RA, CP, and VG. The data and literature review was performed by AA, AI, KA, WF, RBS, SH, and VG. Drafting of the manuscript was performed by all the authors. AA compiled all the sections from various authors. The final manuscript was read, critically reviewed, and submitted for publication by all the authors.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Advanced Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Sector 12, Chandigarh, 160012, India
(2)
Eye Clinic, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Science “L. Sacco”, Luigi Sacco Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
(3)
Schepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
(4)
National Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
(5)
Moorfields Eye Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
(6)
Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore

References

  1. Neri P, Lettieri M, Fortuna C, Manoni M, Giovannini A (2009) Inflammatory choroidal neovascularization. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 16(4):245–251. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.58422 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Dhingra N, Kelly S, Majid MA, Bailey CB, Dick AD (2010) Inflammatory choroidal neovascular membrane in posterior uveitis-pathogenesis and treatment. Indian J Ophthalmol 58(1):3–10. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.58467 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bansal R, Bansal P, Gupta A et al (2017) Diagnostic challenges in inflammatory choroidal neovascular membranes. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 25(4):554–562. https://doi.org/10.3109/09273948.2016.1160128 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahnood D, Madhusudhan S, Tsaloumas MD, Waheed NK, Keane PA, Denniston AK (2017) Punctate inner choroidopathy: a review. Surv Ophthalmol 62(2):113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2016.10.003 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Baxter SL, Pistilli M, Pujari SS et al (2013) Risk of choroidal neovascularization among the uveitides. Am J Ophthalmol 156(3):468–477.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.04.040 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Liu B, Faia L, Hu M, Nussenblatt RB (2010) Pro-angiogenic effect of IFNgamma is dependent on the PI3K/mTOR/translational pathway in human retinal pigmented epithelial cells. Mol Vis 16:184–193PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen SY, Laroche A, Leguen Y, Soubrane G, Coscas GJ (1996) Etiology of choroidal neovascularization in young patients. Ophthalmology 103(8):1241–1244PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Grossniklaus HE, Green WR (2004) Choroidal neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol 137(3):496–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2003.09.042 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Miller DG, Singerman LJ (2006) Vision loss in younger patients: a review of choroidal neovascularization. Optom Vis Sci 83(5):316–325. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.opx.0000216019.88256.eb PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Winterhalter S, Joussen AM, Pleyer U, Stübiger N (2012) Inflammatory choroidal neovascularisations. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 229(9):897–904. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1315249 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Fine SL, Owens SL, Haller JA, Knox DL, Patz A (1981) Choroidal neovascularization as a late complication of ocular toxoplasmosis. Am J Ophthalmol 91(3):318–322PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Lampariello DA, Primo SA (1999) Ocular toxocariasis: a rare presentation of a posterior pole granuloma with an associated choroidal neovascular membrane. J Am Optom Assoc 70(4):245–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chung YM, Yeh TS, Sheu SJ, Liu JH (1989) Macular subretinal neovascularization in choroidal tuberculosis. Ann Ophthalmol 21(6):225–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Deutman AF, Grizzard WS (1978) Rubella retinopathy and subretinal neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol 85(1):82–87PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. null H, null T, null M (2000) Neovascular maculopathy associated with rubella retinopathy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 44(6):697Google Scholar
  16. Khairallah M, Ben Yahia S, Attia S, Jelliti B, Zaouali S, Ladjimi A (2006) Severe ischemic maculopathy in a patient with West Nile virus infection. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 37(3):240–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wilson ME, Mazur DO (1988) Choroidal neovascularization in children: report of five cases and literature review. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 25(1):23–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Roy R, Saurabh K, Bansal A, Kumar A, Majumdar AK, Paul SS (2017) Inflammatory choroidal neovascularization in Indian eyes: etiology, clinical features, and outcomes to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor. Indian J Ophthalmol 65(4):295–300. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_262_16 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. D’Ambrosio E, Tortorella P, Iannetti L (2014) Management of uveitis-related choroidal neovascularization: from the pathogenesis to the therapy. J Ophthalmol 2014:450428. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/450428 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Invernizzi A, Agarwal A, Di Nicola M, Franzetti F, Staurenghi G, Viola F (2017) Choroidal neovascular membranes secondary to intraocular tuberculosis misdiagnosed as neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Eur J Ophthalmol October 0. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5001047
  21. Told R, Sacu S, Hecht A et al (2018) Comparison of SD-optical coherence tomography angiography and indocyanine green angiography in type 1 and 2 neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 59(6):2393–2400. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-22902 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Gass JD (1984) Pathogenesis of tears of the retinal pigment epithelium. Br J Ophthalmol 68(8):513–519PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Grossniklaus HE, Gass JD (1998) Clinicopathologic correlations of surgically excised type 1 and type 2 submacular choroidal neovascular membranes. Am J Ophthalmol 126(1):59–69PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lu M, Adamis AP (2006) Molecular biology of choroidal neovascularization. Ophthalmol Clin N Am 19(3):323–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ohc.2006.05.001 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ba J, Peng R-S, Xu D et al (2015) Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for treating wet age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Des Devel Ther 9:5397–5405. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S86269 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Chang JH, McCluskey PJ, Wakefield D (2005) Acute anterior uveitis and HLA-B27. Surv Ophthalmol 50(4):364–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2005.04.003 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Rofagha S, Bhisitkul RB, Boyer DS, Sadda SR, Zhang K, SEVEN-UP Study Group (2013) Seven-year outcomes in ranibizumab-treated patients in ANCHOR, MARINA, and HORIZON: a multicenter cohort study (SEVEN-UP). Ophthalmology 120(11):2292–2299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.03.046 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaiser PK, Brown DM, Zhang K et al (2007) Ranibizumab for predominantly classic neovascular age-related macular degeneration: subgroup analysis of first-year ANCHOR results. Am J Ophthalmol 144(6):850–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2007.08.012 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Agarwal A, Aggarwal K, Gupta V (2016) Management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a review on landmark randomized controlled trials. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 23(1):27–37. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.173133 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Brown DM, Regillo CD (2007) Anti-VEGF agents in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: applying clinical trial results to the treatment of everyday patients. Am J Ophthalmol 144(4):627–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2007.06.039 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Do DV, Gower EW, Cassard SD et al (2012) Detection of new-onset choroidal neovascularization using optical coherence tomography: the AMD DOC study. Ophthalmology 119(4):771–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.10.019 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Kotsolis AI, Killian FA, Ladas ID, Yannuzzi LA (2010) Fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography concordance for choroidal neovascularisation in multifocal choroidtis. Br J Ophthalmol 94(11):1506–1508. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.159913 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Bischoff PM, Flower RW (1985) Ten years experience with choroidal angiography using indocyanine green dye: a new routine examination or an epilogue? Doc Ophthalmol 60(3):235–291PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Agrawal RV, Biswas J, Gunasekaran D (2013) Indocyanine green angiography in posterior uveitis. Indian J Ophthalmol 61(4):148–159. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.112159 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Atmaca LS, Batioğlu F, Atmaca P (1996) Evaluation of choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration with fluorescein and indocyanine green videoangiography. Ophthalmologica 210(3):148–151. https://doi.org/10.1159/000310695 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Rush RB, Rush SW (2015) Evaluation of idiopathic choroidal neovascularization with indocyanine green angiography in patients undergoing bevacizumab therapy. J Ophthalmol 2015:642624. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/642624 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Perentes Y, Van Tran T, Sickenberg M, Herbort CP (2005) Subretinal neovascular membranes complicating uveitis: frequency, treatments, and visual outcome. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 13(2–3):219–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09273940490518883 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Drexler W, Fujimoto JG (2008) State-of-the-art retinal optical coherence tomography. Prog Retin Eye Res 27(1):45–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.07.005 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Mrejen S, Spaide RF (2013) Optical coherence tomography: imaging of the choroid and beyond. Surv Ophthalmol 58(5):387–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.12.001 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Wu K, Zhang X, Su Y et al (2016) Clinical characteristics of inflammatory choroidal neovascularization in a Chinese population. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 24(3):261–267. https://doi.org/10.3109/09273948.2015.1015741 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Sulzbacher F, Kiss C, Munk M, Deak G, Sacu S, Schmidt-Erfurth U (2011) Diagnostic evaluation of type 2 (classic) choroidal neovascularization: optical coherence tomography, indocyanine green angiography, and fluorescein angiography. Am J Ophthalmol 152(5):799–806.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.04.011 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Hoang QV, Cunningham ET, Sorenson JA, Freund KB (2013) The “pitchfork sign” a distinctive optical coherence tomography finding in inflammatory choroidal neovascularization. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 33(5):1049–1055. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e31827e25b8 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Giani A, Luiselli C, Esmaili DD et al (2011) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography as an indicator of fluorescein angiography leakage from choroidal neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52(8):5579–5586. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-6617 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Arevalo JF, Adan A, Berrocal MH et al (2011) Intravitreal bevacizumab for inflammatory choroidal neovascularization: results from the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group at 24 months. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 31(2):353–363. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181ed8cec View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Mansour AM, Arevalo JF, Ziemssen F et al (2009) Long-term visual outcomes of intravitreal bevacizumab in inflammatory ocular neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol 148(2):310–316.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.03.023 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Amer R, Priel E, Kramer M (2015) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic features of choroidal neovascular membranes in multifocal choroiditis and punctate inner choroidopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253(6):949–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-2930-5 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Spaide RF, Goldberg N, Freund KB (2013) Redefining multifocal choroiditis and panuveitis and punctate inner choroidopathy through multimodal imaging. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 33(7):1315–1324. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e318286cc77 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Astroz P, Miere A, Mrejen S et al (2018) Optical coherence tomography angiography to distinguish choroidal neovascularization from macular inflammatory lesions in multifocal choroiditis. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 38(2):299–309. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001617 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Agrawal R, Xin W, Keane PA, Chhablani J, Agarwal A (2016) Optical coherence tomography angiography: a non-invasive tool to image end-arterial system. Expert Rev Med Devices 13(6):519–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2016.1186540 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Yu S, Lu J, Cao D et al (2016) The role of optical coherence tomography angiography in fundus vascular abnormalities. BMC Ophthalmol 16:107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0277-2 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Hagag AM, Gao SS, Jia Y, Huang D (2017) Optical coherence tomography angiography: technical principles and clinical applications in ophthalmology. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 7(3):115–129. https://doi.org/10.4103/tjo.tjo_31_17 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Sambhav K, Grover S, Chalam KV (2017) The application of optical coherence tomography angiography in retinal diseases. Surv Ophthalmol 62(6):838–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.05.006 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Pichi F, Sarraf D, Morara M, Mazumdar S, Neri P, Gupta V (2017) Pearls and pitfalls of optical coherence tomography angiography in the multimodal evaluation of uveitis. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect 7(1):20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12348-017-0138-z PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Pichi F, Sarraf D, Arepalli S et al (2017) The application of optical coherence tomography angiography in uveitis and inflammatory eye diseases. Prog Retin Eye Res 59:178–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.04.005 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Xue J, Camino A, Bailey ST, Liu X, Li D, Jia Y (2018) Automatic quantification of choroidal neovascularization lesion area on OCT angiography based on density cell-like P systems with active membranes. Biomed Opt Express 9(7):3208–3219. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.9.003208 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Jia Y, Bailey ST, Wilson DJ et al (2014) Quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography of choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 121(7):1435–1444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.034 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. de Carlo TE, Bonini Filho MA, Chin AT et al (2015) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography of choroidal neovascularization. Ophthalmology 122(6):1228–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.01.029 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Lupidi M, Cerquaglia A, Chhablani J et al (2018) Optical coherence tomography angiography in age-related macular degeneration: the game changer. Eur J Ophthalmol 28(4):349–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672118766807 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. de Carlo TE, Romano A, Waheed NK, Duker JS (2015) A review of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Int J Retina Vitreous 1:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-015-0005-8 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Mrejen S, Giocanti-Auregan A, Tabary S, Cohen SY (2018) Sensitivity of 840-nm spectral domain optical coherence tomography angiography in detecting type 1 neovascularization according to the height of the associated pigment epithelial detachment. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002244
  61. Nikolopoulou E, Lorusso M, Micelli Ferrari L et al (2018) Optical coherence tomography angiography versus dye angiography in age-related macular degeneration: sensitivity and specificity analysis. Biomed Res Int 2018:6724818. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6724818 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Tan ACS, Freund KB, Balaratnasingam C, Simhaee D, Yannuzzi LA (2017) Imaging of pigment epithelial detachments with optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina (Philadelphia, PA). https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002016
  63. Abu El-Asrar AM, Struyf S, Kangave D et al (2012) Cytokine and CXC chemokine expression patterns in aqueous humor of patients with presumed tuberculous uveitis. Cytokine 59(2):377–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2012.04.030 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Faridi A, Jia Y, Gao SS et al (2017) Sensitivity and specificity of OCT angiography to detect choroidal neovascularization. Ophthalmol Retina 1(4):294–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2017.02.007 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Anegondi N, Chidambara L, Bhanushali D, Gadde SGK, Yadav NK, Sinha Roy A (2018) An automated framework to quantify areas of regional ischemia in retinal vascular diseases with OCT angiography. J Biophotonics 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201600312
  66. Al-Sheikh M, Iafe NA, Phasukkijwatana N, Sadda SR, Sarraf D (2018) Biomarkers of neovascular activity in age-related macular degeneration using optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 38(2):220–230. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001628 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Kuehlewein L, Bansal M, Lenis TL et al (2015) Optical coherence tomography angiography of type 1 neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 160(4):739–748.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.06.030 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Roisman L, Zhang Q, Wang RK et al (2016) Optical coherence tomography angiography of asymptomatic neovascularization in intermediate age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 123(6):1309–1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.044 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Ahmed D, Stattin M, Graf A et al (2017) Detection of treatment-naive choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration by swept source optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina (Philadelphia, PA). https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001832
  70. Miere A, Butori P, Cohen SY et al (2017) Vascular remodeling of choroidal neovascularization after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy visualized on optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina (Philadelphia, PA). https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001964
  71. Cheng L, Chen X, Weng S et al (2016) Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography findings in multifocal choroiditis with active lesions. Am J Ophthalmol 169:145–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.06.029 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Zahid S, Chen KC, Jung JJ et al (2017) Optical coherence tomography angiography of chorioretinal lesions due to idiopathic multifocal choroiditis. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 37(8):1451–1463. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001381 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Yee HY, Keane PA, Ho SL, Agrawal R (2016) Optical coherence tomography angiography of choroidal neovascularization associated with tuberculous serpiginous-like choroiditis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 24(6):699–701. https://doi.org/10.3109/09273948.2015.1109669 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Levison AL, Baynes KM, Lowder CY, Kaiser PK, Srivastava SK (2017) Choroidal neovascularisation on optical coherence tomography angiography in punctate inner choroidopathy and multifocal choroiditis. Br J Ophthalmol 101(5):616–622. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308806 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Nozaki M, Hamada S, Kimura M, Yoshida M, Ogura Y (2016) Value of OCT angiography in the diagnosis of choroidal neovascularization complicating multiple evanescence white dot syndrome. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 47(6):580–584. https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20160601-11 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Parodi MB, Iacono P, La Spina C et al (2014) Intravitreal bevacizumab for choroidal neovascularisation in serpiginous choroiditis. Br J Ophthalmol 98(4):519–522. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304237 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Pichi F, Srivastava SK, Levinson A, Baynes KM, Traut C, Lowder CY (2016) A focal chorioretinal bartonella lesion analyzed by optical coherence tomography angiography. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 47(6):585–588. https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20160601-12 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Baumal CR, de Carlo TE, Waheed NK, Salz DA, Witkin AJ, Duker JS (2015) Sequential optical coherence tomographic angiography for diagnosis and treatment of choroidal neovascularization in multifocal choroiditis. JAMA Ophthalmol 133(9):1087–1090. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1946 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Nakao S, Kaizu Y, Oshima Y, Sakamoto T, Ishibashi T, Sonoda K-H (2016) Optical coherence tomography angiography for detecting choroidal neovascularization secondary to punctate inner choroidopathy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 47(12):1157–1161. https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20161130-13 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Aggarwal K, Agarwal A, Sharma A, Sharma K, Gupta V, OCTA Study Group (2018) Detection of type 1 choroidal neovascular membranes using optical coherence tomography angiography in tubercular posterior uveitis. Retina (Philadelphia, PA). https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002176
  81. Talks SJ, Aftab AM, Ashfaq I, Soomro T (2017) The role of new imaging methods in managing age-related macular degeneration. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 6(6):498–507. https://doi.org/10.22608/APO.2017305 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Milani P, Massacesi A, Moschini S et al (2016) Multimodal imaging and diagnosis of myopic choroidal neovascularization in Caucasians. Clin Ophthalmol 10:1749–1757. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S108509 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Toju R, Iida T, Sekiryu T, Saito M, Maruko I, Kano M (2012) Near-infrared autofluorescence in patients with idiopathic submacular choroidal neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol 153(2):314–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.06.026 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Kellner U, Kellner S, Weinitz S (2010) Fundus autofluorescence (488 NM) and near-infrared autofluorescence (787 NM) visualize different retinal pigment epithelium alterations in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 30(1):6–15View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Theelen T, Berendschot TTJM, Hoyng CB, Boon CJF, Klevering BJ (2009) Near-infrared reflectance imaging of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 247(12):1625–1633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1148-9 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Chang TS, Bressler NM, Fine JT et al (2007) Improved vision-related function after ranibizumab treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results of a randomized clinical trial. Arch Ophthalmol 125(11):1460–1469. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.125.11.1460 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Schadlu R, Blinder KJ, Shah GK et al (2008) Intravitreal bevacizumab for choroidal neovascularization in ocular histoplasmosis. Am J Ophthalmol 145(5):875–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2007.12.030 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Ben Yahia S, Herbort CP, Jenzeri S et al (2008) Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) as primary and rescue treatment for choroidal neovascularization secondary to ocular toxoplasmosis. Int Ophthalmol 28(4):311–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-008-9218-2 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Shah NJ, Shah UN (2011) Intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of choroidal neovascularization secondary to ocular toxoplasmosis. Indian J Ophthalmol 59(4):318–319. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.82005 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Lyall D a M, Hutchison BM, Gaskell A, Varikkara M (2010) Intravitreal ranibizumab in the treatment of choroidal neovascularisation secondary to ocular toxocariasis in a 13-year-old boy. Eye (Lond) 24(11):1730–1731. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2010.131 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Yoon DY, Woo SJ (2018) Intravitreal administration of ranibizumab and bevacizumab for choroidal neovascularization secondary to ocular toxocariasis: a case report. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 26(4):639–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2016.1239744 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Julian K, Langner-Wegscheider B-J, Haas A, De Smet MD (2013) Intravitreal methotrexate in the management of presumed tuberculous serpiginous-like choroiditis. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 33(9):1943–1948. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e318285cdbe View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Lee Kim E, Rodger DC, Rao NA (2017) Choroidal neovascularization secondary to tuberculosis: presentation and management. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 5:124–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2016.12.025 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Wu L, Evans T, Saravia M, Schlaen A, Couto C (2009) Intravitreal bevacizumab for choroidal neovascularization secondary to Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome. Jpn J Ophthalmol 53(1):57–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-008-0600-4 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Fine HF, Zhitomirsky I, Freund KB et al (2009) Bevacizumab (Avastin) and ranibizumab (Lucentis) for choroidal neovascularization in multifocal choroiditis. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 29(1):8–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e318187aff9 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Chang LK, Spaide RF, Brue C, Freund KB, Klancnik JM, Slakter JS (2008) Bevacizumab treatment for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization from causes other than age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 126(7):941–945. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.126.7.941 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Christmas NJ, Oh KT, Oh DM, Folk JC (2002) Long-term follow-up of patients with serpinginous choroiditis. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 22(5):550–556View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Mavrakanas N, Mendrinos E, Tabatabay C, Pournaras CJ (2010) Intravitreal ranibizumab for choroidal neovascularization secondary to acute multifocal posterior placoid pigment epitheliopathy. Acta Ophthalmol 88(2):e54–e55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01541.x PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Rothova A (2002) Corticosteroids in uveitis. Ophthalmol Clin N Am 15(3):389–394View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Edelman JL, Lutz D, Castro MR (2005) Corticosteroids inhibit VEGF-induced vascular leakage in a rabbit model of blood-retinal and blood-aqueous barrier breakdown. Exp Eye Res 80(2):249–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2004.09.013 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Oliver A, Ciulla TA (2006) Corticosteroids as antiangiogenic agents. Ophthalmol Clin N Am 19(3):345–351, v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ohc.2006.05.002 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Martidis A, Miller DG, Ciulla TA, Danis RP, Moorthy RS (1999) Corticosteroids as an antiangiogenic agent for histoplasmosis-related subfoveal choroidal neovascularization. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 15(5):425–428. https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.1999.15.425 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Rechtman E, Allen VD, Danis RP, Pratt LM, Harris A, Speicher MA (2003) Intravitreal triamcinolone for choroidal neovascularization in ocular histoplasmosis syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 136(4):739–741PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Chan W-M, Lai TYY, Lau TTY, Lee VYW, Liu DTL, Lam DSC (2008) Combined photodynamic therapy and intravitreal triamcinolone for choroidal neovascularization secondary to punctate inner choroidopathy or of idiopathic origin: one-year results of a prospective series. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 28(1):71–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e31815e9339 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Fong KCS, Thomas D, Amin K, Inzerillo D, Horgan SE (2008) Photodynamic therapy combined with systemic corticosteroids for choroidal neovascularisation secondary to punctate inner choroidopathy. Eye (Lond). 22(4):528–533. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702688 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Giovannini A, Neri P, Mercanti L, Bruè C (2007) Photodynamic treatment versus photodynamic treatment associated with systemic steroids for idiopathic choroidal neovascularisation. Br J Ophthalmol 91(5):620–623. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2006.103135 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Pai SA, Hebri SP, Lootah AM (2012) Management of recurrent inflammatory choroidal neovascular membrane secondary to Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome, using combined intravitreal injection of bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetate. Indian J Ophthalmol 60(6):551–552. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.103795 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Jasielska M, Semkova I, Shi X et al (2010) Differential role of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha receptors in the development of choroidal neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(8):3874–3883. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-5003 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Shi X, Semkova I, Müther PS, Dell S, Kociok N, Joussen AM (2006) Inhibition of TNF-alpha reduces laser-induced choroidal neovascularization. Exp Eye Res 83(6):1325–1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2006.07.007 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Regatieri CV, Dreyfuss JL, Melo GB, Lavinsky D, Farah ME, Nader HB (2009) Dual role of intravitreous infliximab in experimental choroidal neovascularization: effect on the expression of sulfated glycosaminoglycans. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50(11):5487–5494. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-3171 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Kilmartin DJ, Forrester JV, Dick AD (1998) Cyclosporine-induced resolution of choroidal neovascularization associated with sympathetic ophthalmia. Arch Ophthalmol 116(2):249–250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Dees C, Arnold JJ, Forrester JV, Dick AD (1998) Immunosuppressive treatment of choroidal neovascularization associated with endogenous posterior uveitis. Arch Ophthalmol 116(11):1456–1461PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Neri P, Manoni M, Fortuna C, Lettieri M, Mariotti C, Giovannini A (2010) Association of systemic steroids and mycophenolate mofetil as rescue therapy for uveitic choroidal neovascularization unresponsive to the traditional immunosuppressants: interventional case series. Int Ophthalmol 30(5):583–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-009-9323-x PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Ganesh S, Ahmed A, Biswas J (2017) Analysis of the clinical profile and management of inflammatory choriodal neovascular membranes in uveitic eyes: a study from a tertiary referral center. Ocul Immunol Inflamm October:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2017.1375119
  115. Hogan A, Behan U, Kilmartin DJ (2005) Outcomes after combination photodynamic therapy and immunosuppression for inflammatory subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation. Br J Ophthalmol 89(9):1109–1111. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2004.063024 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Kolomeyer AM, Roy MS, Chu DS (2011) The use of intravitreal ranibizumab for choroidal neovascularization associated with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome. Case Rep Med 2011:747648. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/747648 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Mateo-Montoya A, Baglivo E, de Smet MD (2013) Intravitreal methotrexate for the treatment of choroidal neovascularization in multifocal choroiditis. Eye (Lond). 27(2):277–278. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2012.262 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. JHSPH Center for Clinical Trials. macular edema ranibizumab v. Intravitreal Anti-inflammatory Therapy Trial (MERIT) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02623426. Accessed 21 July 2018.
  119. Lim JI, Flaxel CJ, LaBree L (2006) Photodynamic therapy for choroidal neovascularisation secondary to inflammatory chorioretinal disease. Ann Acad Med Singap 35(3):198–202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Rogers AH, Duker JS, Nichols N, Baker BJ (2003) Photodynamic therapy of idiopathic and inflammatory choroidal neovascularization in young adults. Ophthalmology 110(7):1315–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00466-4 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. Postelmans L, Pasteels B, Coquelet P et al (2005) Photodynamic therapy for subfoveal classic choroidal neovascularization related to punctate inner choroidopathy (PIC) or presumed ocular histoplasmosis-like syndrome (POHS-like). Ocul Immunol Inflamm 13(5):361–366PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. Wachtlin J, Heimann H, Behme T, Foerster MH (2003) Long-term results after photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for choroidal neovascularizations secondary to inflammatory chorioretinal diseases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 241(11):899–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-003-0734-5 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  123. Mauget-Faÿsse M, Mimoun G, Ruiz-Moreno JM et al (2006) Verteporfin photodynamic therapy for choroidal neovascularization associated with toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 26(4):396–403. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.iae.0000238552.76412.ae View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  124. Neri P, Mercanti L, Mariotti C, Salvolini S, Giovannini A (2010) Long-term control of choroidal neovascularization in quiescent congenital toxoplasma retinochoroiditis with photodynamic therapy: 4-year results. Int Ophthalmol 30(1):51–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-008-9291-6 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  125. Rishi P, Venkataraman A, Rishi E (2011) Combination photodynamic therapy and bevacizumab for choroidal neovascularization associated with toxoplasmosis. Indian J Ophthalmol 59(1):62–64PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Nóbrega MJ, Rosa EL (2007) Toxoplasmosis retinochoroiditis after photodynamic therapy and intravitreal triamcinolone for a supposed choroidal neovascularization: a case report. Arq Bras Oftalmol 70(1):157–160PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  127. Nowilaty SR, Bouhaimed M (2006) Photodynamic Therapy Study Group. Photodynamic therapy for subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation in Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease. Br J Ophthalmol 90(8):982–986. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2006.091538 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Farah ME, Costa RA, Muccioli C, Guia TA, Belfort R (2002) Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 134(1):137–139PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Parodi MB, Iacono P, Spasse S, Ravalico G (2006) Photodynamic therapy for juxtafoveal choroidal neovascularization associated with multifocal choroiditis. Am J Ophthalmol 141(1):123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2005.07.045 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  130. Parodi MB, Iacono P, Kontadakis DS, Zucchiatti I, Cascavilla ML, Bandello F (2010) Bevacizumab vs photodynamic therapy for choroidal neovascularization in multifocal choroiditis. Arch Ophthalmol 128(9):1100–1103. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.205 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. Benson MT, Callear A, Tsaloumas M, Chhina J, Beatty S (1998) Surgical excision of subfoveal neovascular membranes. Eye (Lond). 12(Pt 5):768–774. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1998.200 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  132. Adán A, Mateo C, Wolley-Dod C (2003) Surgery for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis. Am J Ophthalmol 135(3):386–387PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Recchia FM, Shah GK, Eagle RC, Sivalingam A, Fischer DH (2002) Visual and anatomical outcome following submacular surgery for choroidal neovascularization secondary to Candida endophthalmitis. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 22(3):323–329View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Jampol LM, Sung J, Walker JD et al (1996) Choroidal neovascularization secondary to Candida albicans chorioretinitis. Am J Ophthalmol 121(6):643–649PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  135. Kazokoglu H, Onal S, Tugal-Tutkun I et al (2008) Demographic and clinical features of uveitis in tertiary centers in Turkey. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 15(5):285–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/09286580802262821 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  136. Walia HS, Shah GK, Blinder KJ (2016) Treatment of CNV secondary to presumed ocular histoplasmosis with intravitreal aflibercept 2.0 mg injection. Can J Ophthalmol 51(2):91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.11.007 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  137. Saperstein DA, Rosenfeld PJ, Bressler NM et al (2002) Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization with verteporfin in the ocular histoplasmosis syndrome: one-year results of an uncontrolled, prospective case series. Ophthalmology 109(8):1499–1505PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  138. Fountain JA, Schlaegel TF (1981) Linear streaks of the equator in the presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 99(2):246–248PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  139. Kijlstra A, Petersen E (2014) Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and the future of ocular toxoplasmosis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 22(2):138–147. https://doi.org/10.3109/09273948.2013.823214 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  140. Butler NJ, Furtado JM, Winthrop KL, Smith JR (2013) Ocular toxoplasmosis II: clinical features, pathology and management. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 41(1):95–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02838.x PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  141. Gupta V, Gupta A, Rao NA (2007) Intraocular tuberculosis--an update. Surv Ophthalmol 52(6):561–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2007.08.015 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  142. Gupta V, Shoughy SS, Mahajan S et al (2015) Clinics of ocular tuberculosis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 23(1):14–24. https://doi.org/10.3109/09273948.2014.986582 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  143. Bakri SJ, Kaiser PK (2004) Ocular manifestations of West Nile virus. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 15(6):537–540PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  144. Khairallah M, Ben Yahia S, Ladjimi A et al (2004) Chorioretinal involvement in patients with West Nile virus infection. Ophthalmology 111(11):2065–2070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.03.032 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  145. Yahia SB, Khairallah M (2009) Ocular manifestations of West Nile virus infection. Int J Med Sci 6(3):114–115PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  146. Kedhar SR, Thorne JE, Wittenberg S, Dunn JP, Jabs DA (2007) Multifocal choroiditis with panuveitis and punctate inner choroidopathy: comparison of clinical characteristics at presentation. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 27(9):1174–1179. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e318068de72 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  147. Thorne JE, Wittenberg S, Jabs DA et al (2006) Multifocal choroiditis with panuveitis incidence of ocular complications and of loss of visual acuity. Ophthalmology 113(12):2310–2316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.067 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  148. Nazari Khanamiri H, Rao NA (2013) Serpiginous choroiditis and infectious multifocal serpiginoid choroiditis. Surv Ophthalmol 58(3):203–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.08.008 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  149. Parikh R, Sakurada Y, Yannuzzi LA (June 2018) Multimodal imaging to monitor recurrent serpiginous choroiditis. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.06.009
  150. Ahn SJ, Park SH, Lee BR (2017) Multimodal imaging including optical coherence tomography angiography in serpiginous choroiditis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 25(2):287–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2017.1288824 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  151. Rao NA, Gupta A, Dustin L et al (2010) Frequency of distinguishing clinical features in Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease. Ophthalmology 117(3):591–599, 599.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.08.030 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  152. Read RW (2002) Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease. Ophthalmol Clin N Am 15(3):333–341 viiView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  153. Yang P, Ren Y, Li B, Fang W, Meng Q, Kijlstra A (2007) Clinical characteristics of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome in Chinese patients. Ophthalmology 114(3):606–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.07.040 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  154. Korol AR, Zborovska O, Kustryn T, Dorokhova O, Pasyechnikova N (2017) Intravitreal aflibercept for choroidal neovascularization associated with chorioretinitis: a pilot study. Clin Ophthalmol 11:1315–1320. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S132923 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  155. Mansour AM, Mackensen F, Mahendradas P, Khairallah M, Lai TY, Bashshur Z (2012) Five-year visual results of intravitreal bevacizumab in refractory inflammatory ocular neovascularization. Clin Ophthalmol 6:1233–1237. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S34294 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  156. Iannetti L, Paroli MP, Fabiani C, Nardella C, Campanella M, Pivetti-Pezzi P (2013) Effects of intravitreal bevacizumab on inflammatory choroidal neovascular membrane. Eur J Ophthalmol 23(1):114–118. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000192 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  157. Julián K, Terrada C, Fardeau C et al (2011) Intravitreal bevacizumab as first local treatment for uveitis-related choroidal neovascularization: long-term results. Acta Ophthalmol 89(2):179–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02046.x PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  158. Cornish KS, Williams GJ, Gavin MP, Imrie FR (2011) Visual and optical coherence tomography outcomes of intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab in inflammatory choroidal neovascularization secondary to punctate inner choroidopathy. Eur J Ophthalmol 21(4):440–445. https://doi.org/10.5301/EJO.2010.6117 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  159. Kramer M, Axer-Siegel R, Jaouni T et al (2010) Bevacizumab for choroidal neovascularization related to inflammatory diseases. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 30(6):938–944. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181c96a00 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  160. Lott MN, Schiffman JC, Davis JL (2009) Bevacizumab in inflammatory eye disease. Am J Ophthalmol 148(5):711–717.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.06.010 PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  161. Doctor PP, Bhat P, Sayed R, Foster CS (2009) Intravitreal bevacizumab for uveitic choroidal neovascularization. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 17(2):118–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/09273940802650406 PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  162. Adán A, Mateo C, Navarro R, Bitrian E, Casaroli-Marano RP (2007) Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) injection as primary treatment of inflammatory choroidal neovascularization. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa) 27(9):1180–1186. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e31815e9834 View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement