- Brief report
- Open Access
Fungal keratitis after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a case report and review of the literature
Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection volume 11, Article number: 25 (2021)
To report a case of perforated fungal keratitis after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) treated with penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).
Case report and literature review.
A 41-year-old woman presented with culture-proven unilateral fungal keratitis 4 days after uneventful SMILE. Her visual acuity was hand motion. The patient was treated with voriconazole irrigation (50 μm/0.1 ml) of the pocket and intrastromal voriconazole injection, in addition to systemic and topical antifungals. Despite aggressive management and decreased infiltration, the cornea was perforated and subsequently treated with PKP.
Infectious keratitis after SMILE is unusual. To our knowledge, this is the first report of perforated fungal keratitis post-SMILE. PKP eradicated the infection.
Infectious keratitis (IK) is a rare yet devastating complication after refractive surgery. A recent meta-analysis reported the risk of IK post keratorefractive surgery as 4 per 10,000 eyes . Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is a relatively new flapless procedure that take benefit from femtosecond laser to cut a precise intrastromal lenticule, which is then extracted via a small keyhole incision . Only few cases of IK post-SMILE have been reported [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. We report an unusual severe unilateral fungal keratitis post-SMILE. The ulcer was refractory to medical treatment and required penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).
A 41-year-old woman presented to our emergency department with pain and redness in her right eye (RE) for three days. Her past medical history was unremarkable. Four days ago, she underwent uneventful bilateral SMILE procedure for myopia. Her preoperative refractive errors were RE − 3.0 sph and left eye (LE) -3.0 sph − 0.5 cyl 180 axis. The superior cap depth was set at 120 μm, and the depth of the side cut was set at 2 mm. Postoperatively, she was prescribed topical levofloxacin (5 mg/ml) and betamethasone (0.1%) eyedrops every 6 h. Her best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in her RE was hand motion (HM) and in her left eye (LE) 20/20. The external examination of the RE showed upper eyelid swelling and protective ptosis. On slit-lamp exam, moderate conjunctival injection and paracentral corneal infiltrate measuring 5 × 5 mm associated with central corneal edema and an overlying epithelial defect were noted (Fig. 1A). A hypopyon which height was 0.2 mm was also seen. The LE exam revealed a clear interface.
Corneal scrapping was performed for microscopic Gram staining that revealed mycelia, and inoculation on Sabouraud and chocolate agars. The patient was admitted and an urgent intrastromal and pocket injection of vancomycin (1 mg/0.1 ml) and voriconazole (50 μg/0.1 ml) was performed—to cover for methicillin resistant S. aureus and potential fungi pathogens. After detecting hyphae in the smear, topical voriconazole (10 mg/ml) and levofloxacin (5 mg/ml) were started at a loading dose of every 5 min for the first hour, then every hour. Oral itraconazole (100 mg) every 12 h was also administered. Her antibiogram was sensitive to voriconazole, itraconazole, amphotericin and natamycin. The antifungal susceptibility test using voriconazole and natamycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was done using the E-test method and it was interpreted based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M38 3rd ed. [10, 11] C. parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) was chosen as a quality control strain in every run. Aspergillus flavus strain showed sensitivity to voriconazole with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.125 μg/mL, and to natamycin (MIC = 0.5 μg/mL). Topical homatropine (2%) was prescribed for cycloplegia. Oral doxycycline (200 mg/daily) and vitamin C (1 g/daily) were added to promote corneal healing. The culture results revealed Aspergillus species. A confocal microscope (HRT 3-RCM; Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Dossenheim, Germany) illustrated the septate branching and interlocking hyphae (Fig. 2). An anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) (CASIA2; Tomey, Nagoya, Japan) displayed the depth of infiltrations extending deeply to the stromal bed (Fig. 3).
After 10 days, clinical improvement was appreciated as the density of the infiltration was reduced, and the hypopyon resolved. The patient was discharged on fortified voriconazole (10 mg/ml) and levofloxacin (5 mg/ml) eye drops and oral itraconazole (100 mg). She was followed periodically. However, during the healing process, and due to poor compliance, the patient suffered from severe corneal thinning that led to perforation (Fig. 1B). Because of the severe tissue loss and thinning, a PKP procedure was inevitable (Fig. 1C). An 8.5-mm donor graft was used. There was no need to perform lensectomy. The culture of the corneal specimen also showed Aspergillosis species. Topical tacrolimus (0.03%) eyedrops every 12 h were added postoperatively to the previous antifungal regimen. Topical steroids every 6 h was started 1 month postop. The patient final BCVA was 20/40 with a refraction of + 3 sph − 7 cyl 135 axis.
SMILE is a newer and less invasive procedure than laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK). IK is a vision-threatening complication after refractive surgery. The incidence and management of IK after LASIK are well documented. We believe that IK post-SMILE may be underreported. Gram-positive bacteria are associated with early-onset post-LASIK IK, whereas fungal and atypical mycobacteria are found in late-onset IK . The safety and efficacy of SMILE is well established and similar to LASIK [2, 13]. The management of IK post-SMILE is more challenging due to the intrastromal closed interface, which is susceptible to rapid spread of infection and is difficult to access in comparison with LASIK flap.
We have reviewed the literature and found a total of ten patients reported to have had post-SMILE IK [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Table 1 summarizes the case reports of post-SMILE IK. Two large cohort studies investigated the safety of SMILE procedure. Ivarsen et al. reported 5 out of 1800 eyes that developed interface infiltrates , and Vestergaard et al. detected only 1 out of 279 eyes . No specific pathogen was isolated in either study. In 2016, Chehaibou et al. reported the first culture-proved case of post-SMILE IK4. All but one case was reported in females. All patients presented within 10 days postoperative. The keratitis was bilateral in two cases. All patients were successfully treated with variable visual outcomes (20/50 to 20/20). The described treatments were interface wash and collagen cross-linking with photoactivated riboflavin (PACK-CXL), in addition to fortified eyedrops. Ganesh et al. safely used a combined PACK-CXL and interface wash approach .
To our knowledge, we report the first culture-proven perforated fungal (Aspergillus) keratitis post-SMILE in the literature. Our patient underwent uneventful bilateral SMILE and had no risk factor or health problems. She presented on postop day 4 complaining of unilateral pain and redness. The ulcer started with paracentral ring infiltration that progressed to deep central infiltrates involving the stromal bed. Despite aggressive management with fortified eyedrops, interface wash and close follow-up, the keratitis led to severe corneal thinning and perforation. The patient underwent therapeutic PKP to eradicate the infection and preserve the global integrity.
Multiple predisposing factors for IK post-SMILE can be postulated including surgical hygiene, surgeon’s experience, environmental conditions, and periocular infections. The intrastromal pocket created in SMILE might harbor microorganisms inoculated intraoperatively. Also, popular postop use of corticosteroids eyedrops might facilitate secondary infection. Fungal keratitis is more virulent and tissue damaging compared to bacterial keratitis. A meticulous diagnosis, aggressive therapy, and close follow-up are necessary. Corneal scraping is vital for diagnosing fungal keratitis, however early treatment should not be delayed. Fungi appear to penetrate deeper corneal layers . When compared to antibiotics, current antifungals have a lower tissue penetration . Fungal keratitis has greater risk to perforate the cornea than bacterial keratitis .
In conclusion, although IK post-SMILE is rare, it can lead to a devastating visual outcome. A rapid diagnosis and aggressive treatment are essential. Fungal keratitis can be refractory to medical treatment, requiring surgical intervention. PKP is a viable option for perforated fungal keratitis.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
small incision lenticule extraction
best-corrected visual acuity
minimum inhibitory concentration
anterior-segment optical coherence tomography
laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis
collagen cross-linking with photoactivated riboflavin
Afsharpaiman S, Zare M, Yasemi M, Jamialahmadi T, Sahebkar A (2020) The prevalence of infectious keratitis after keratorefractive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. J Ophthalmol 2020:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6329321
Sekundo W, Kunert KS, Blum M (2011) Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol 95(3):335–339. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.174284
Chan TC, Chow VW, Jhanji V (2017) Collagen cross-linking with photoactivated riboflavin (PACK-CXL) for bacterial keratitis after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). J Refract Surg 33(4):278–280. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20170126-01
Chehaibou I, Sandali O, Ameline B, Bouheraoua N, Borderie V, Laroche L (2016) Bilateral infectious keratitis after small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 42(4):626–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.03.024
Ganesh S, Brar S, Nagesh B (2020) Management of infectious keratitis following uneventful small-incision lenticule extraction using a multimodal approach–a case report. Indian J Ophthalmol 68:3064
Ivarsen A, Asp S, Hjortdal J (2014) Safety and complications of more than 1500 small-incision lenticule extraction procedures. Ophthalmology 121(4):822–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.11.006
Liu HY, Chu HS, Chen WL, Hu FR, Wang IJ (2018) Bilateral non-tuberculous mycobacterial keratitis after small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg 34(9):633–636. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20180827-01
Sachdev GS, Diwan S, Sachdev MS (2019) Unilateral fungal keratitis after small-incision lenticule extraction. JCRS Online Case Rep 7(1):11–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcro.2018.08.003
Vestergaard A, Ivarsen AR, Asp S, Hjortdal JØ (2012) Small-incision lenticule extraction for moderate to high myopia: predictability, safety, and patient satisfaction. J Cataract Refract Surg 38(11):2003–2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.021
Wayne P. Clinical and laboratory standards institute. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi, approved standard, M38-A2. 2nd ed. Vilanova: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008. Available from: https://infostore.saiglobal.com/en-us/Standards/CLSI-M38-A2-2ED-2008-357324_SAIG_CLSI_CLSI_813977/.
Nasri T, Hedayati MT, Abastabar M, Pasqualotto AC, Armaki MT, Hoseinnejad A, Nabili M (2015) PCR-RFLP on β-tubulin gene for rapid identification of the most clinically important species of aspergillus. J Microbiol Methods 117:144–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2015.08.007
Chang MA, Jain S, Azar DT (2004) Infections following laser in situ keratomileusis: an integration of the published literature. Surv Ophthalmol 49(3):269–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2004.02.007
Lin F, Xu Y, Yang Y (2014) Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia. J Refract Surg 30(4):248–254. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20140320-03
Ansari Z, Miller D, Galor A (2013) Current thoughts in fungal keratitis: diagnosis and treatment. Curr Fungal Infect Rep 7(3):209–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12281-013-0150-1
Thomas PA (2003) Fungal infections of the cornea. Eye 17(8):852–862. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700557
Wong T-Y, Ng T-P, Fong K-S, Tan DT (1997) Risk factors and clinical outcomes between fungal and bacterial keratitis: a comparative study. CLAO J 23(4):275–281
The authors would like to thank Dr. Azam Fattahi for performing and interpreting the antibiogram.
No financial support.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study follows the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was waived because it is a case report.
Consent for publication
Written consent for publication of personal information and images was obtained from patient.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Soleimani, M., Haydar, A.A. Fungal keratitis after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a case report and review of the literature. J Ophthal Inflamm Infect 11, 25 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12348-021-00256-0
- Infectious keratitis
- Fungal keratitis
- Penetrating keratoplasty