Skip to main content
Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
Download PDF

Tubercular serpiginous choroiditis

Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection volume 12, Article number: 37 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Tubercular association with serpiginous choroiditis, also called ‘serpiginous-like choroiditis’ or ‘multifocal serpiginoid choroiditis’ (MSC) is reported from world over, especially from endemic countries. Though the exact mechanism is not yet clear, a direct or indirect infectious trigger by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is believed to cause choroiditis.

The link of immune mechanisms with ocular inflammation caused by MTB is emerging, and has been supported by both experimental and human data. The molecular and histopathological findings of tubercular serpiginous-like choroiditis have been demonstrated in clinicopathological reports, as well as in animal models. Young to middle-aged healthy males are more frequently affected. The choroiditis lesions of tubercular serpiginous-like choroiditis evolve as multifocal lesions, affecting the retinal periphery as well as posterior pole. They begin as discrete lesions, and spread in a serpiginoid pattern to become confluent. Fundus imaging including autofluorescence is extremely helpful in monitoring patients for response to therapy. Its diagnosis is essentially clinical. Corroborative evidence is obtained by a positive tuberculin skin test, or a positive QuantiFERON-TB Gold (Cellestis, Carnegie, Victoria, Australia) test, and/or radiological (chest X-ray or chest CT scan) evidence of TB elsewhere in the body. Systemic corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy to control active inflammation, while ATT helps to reduce recurrence of inflammatory attacks. Immunosuppressive agents are indicated in cases with relentless progression, paradoxical worsening, or recurrent choroiditis.

Serpiginous choroiditis (SC), previously known as geographic choroidopathy [1], or helicoid peripapillary chorioretinal degeneration [2] is a chronic, bilateral, recurrent inflammation of the choroid and choriocapillaris, [3, 4]. The retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and retina get secondarily affected. With no definitive cause known often, an autoimmune mechanism has been postulated to cause SC. Though not common, SC has been associated with a few known systemic diseases, such as sarcoidosis [5, 6], Crohn’s disease [7], polyarteritis nodosa [8], systemic lupus erythematosus [9], non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [10], and Celiac disease [11].

Among the infectious etiologies causing choroiditis mimicking SC, tuberculosis (TB) is the commonest [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Others include toxoplasmosis [28], viral infections [29, 30], fungal infection [31], syphilis [32] and others [33]. Recently, SC has been reported following SARS-CoV-2 infection [34,35,36].

Tubercular association with this variant was coined the term ‘serpiginous-like choroiditis’ (SLC) in 2003 [13], and subsequently ‘multifocal serpiginoid choroiditis’ (MSC) in 2012 [14], to differentiate this variant from the classic SC. Though the diagnosis of both is essentially clinical, the two have several phenotypic differences.

Epidemiology and demography

Tubercular SLC (TBSLC) is considered to be affecting people living in endemic areas [15, 16, 19, 37]. However, it is recently being increasingly recognized in non-endemic areas too [23, 25]. Among the three phenotypes of tubercular choroiditis, TB SLC is the commonest, followed by focal/multifocal choroiditis and tuberculoma [38]. Men are more frequently affected than females, in young to middle-age group.

Pathogenesis: immunological aspects

The first association of TB with SC was given by Hutchinson in 1900 [39]. While various autoimmune mechanisms have been postulated for classic SC [40,41,42], a direct or indirect infectious trigger by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) has been implicated in TBSLC, by demonstrating the presence of MTB in the vitreous, aqueous, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) or choroid [13, 19, 20, 43]. More commonly, although presumptive, presence of latent MTB infection or a systemic, extraocular focus of MTB infection provide etiological association of MTB with SLC [14,15,16,17].

The immune mechanism of tuberculous infection within the human eye has a very limited information. The role of autoimmunity and autoinflammation is emerging in infectious or undifferentiated uveitis, by demonstrating both cellular and humoral responses to several retinal antigens [44,45,46,47]. Forrester et al. described the link of immune mechanisms with ocular inflammation caused by MTB [44]. The MTB targets macrophages and dendritic cells (DC) during the initial infection of the lung. While the MTB either kills them or gets killed by them, it escapes the other myeloid cells and resides in them. These cells latently infected with MTB recirculate out of the granulomas and travel to extrapulmonary sites (lymph nodes, kidney, muscle, meninges and uvea). It resides in these tissues and may get reactivated any time later. Caseation necrosis of the tissue occurs when MTB thrives, causing local infection. In immunocompetent individuals, when the MTB is contained and gets reactivated, it elicits an intense host immune response, causing immune-mediated inflammation and damage. The dead cells release MTB antigen that stimulates innate immune cells to react with autoreactive T cells, leading to a secondary autoimmune response [47].

Experimental data supporting immune mechanisms

In a rabbit model of experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU), granulomatous inflammation was induced in the uveal tissue (iris, ciliary body and choroid) by injecting dead MTB bacilli into the common carotid artery [48]. As the dead bacilli could not cross the blood-retinal-barrier (BRB), the inflammation did not involve the retina.

The choriocapillaris and RPE are the key sites of inflammation in TBSLC. In a mouse model, the viable MTB could induce inflammasome activation in the RPE through its two constituents, Early Secreted Antigenic Target-6 (ESAT-6) and mycobacterial RNA (double stranded) [49]. Both ESAT-6 and mycobacterial RNA represent microbial viability. Even when ESAT-6 was injected in subretinal space, the inflammasome was activated in mice. The MTB protein ESAT-6 is one of the key virulence factors of MTB. It is also a potent activator of NLRP3 (NOD-like receptor family, pyrin domain containing 3) inflammasome. The study demonstrated the expression of NLRP3 in human TBU specimens, and ability of both ESAT-6 and RNA components from MTB (even in the absence of complete MTB bacilli) to activate the inflammasome in iris, choroid, retina and RPE in human TBU, suggesting an innate immune response.

Immunization with retinal antigens (combined with Complete Freunds Adjuvant containing heat-killed MTB) induces an autoimmune response (T cell mediated) in the retina and other tissues, which forms the basis of EAU [50]. It is likely that a similar mechanism causes uveitis in human eyes, by the MTB antigens released from the dead or live bacilli present within the eye or at an extraocular site, which cause priming of autoreactive T cells.

In another animal model, evidence of intraocular inflammation was seen after systemic and local priming of the rat with injection (subcutaneous followed by intravitreal a week later) of mycobacterial antigen (Mtb H37Ra). This may be extrapolated to the mechanism of uveitis seen in humans with corroborative (immunological and/or radiological) evidence of past MTB infection [51, 52].

Human data supporting immune mechanisms

Tagirasa et al. identified autoreactive T cells in eyes with tubercular uveitis (TBU) [47]. The clinical phenotypes of TBU in their series included retinal vasculitis, MSC (or SLC), focal choroiditis and intermediate uveitis. They analysed the intraocular T cell response in vitreous fluid, and found it to be highly pro-inflammatory, involving effector and central memory T cells. Regarding the cellular source of these cytokines, they found CD4+ cells to be the predominant phenotype in all eyes with TBU. Further, they detected polyfunctional cytokine responses to MTB-secreted ESAT-6 peptides, suggesting that the T cell response within the vitreous was directed against active MTB infection. Also, absence of this cytokine response to ESAT-6 in the corresponding blood samples of TBU patients indicated the localized nature of MTB-specific response, being restricted to the eye. Breakdown of BRB, caused by MTB-induced inflammation, allows entry of peripheral autoreactive cells into the eye. The cognate self-antigens, which are significantly more abundant than MTB antigens in the eye, activate the peripheral autoreactive cells to proliferate within the eye. A prolonged or recurrent intraocular inflammation is probably attributed to relative resistance of autoreactive T cells to antigen-induced cell death. This study provided a definitive evidence of both direct (intraocular T cell response to ESAT-6, the mycobacterial antigen) and an indirect (cytokine production by intraocular T cells to retinal crude extract or RCE) response in eyes with TBU, including TBSLC. However, it is not known whether the T cells reacting to two different antigens (mycobacterial antigen and RCE antigen) represent two different populations within the eye, indicating a cross-reactivity. Also, whether the autoreactivity of T cells is an epiphenomenon needs to be explored.

Subsequently, Basu et al. critically reviewed two main mechanisms causing inflammation in the eye due to TB: a direct MTB-driven inflammation, caused by live/replicating MTB within the eye, and an indirect inflammatory response (immune mediated) to non-viable MTB (or its components) within the eye [53]. A combination of both these mechanisms is likely to play a role in various phenotypic presentations of TBU.

An increase in the proinflammatory cytokines in intraocular fluid (vitreous/aqueous humour) of TBU patients has also been reported by a few studies [54,55,56]. Sharma et al. studied the cellular composition and local cytokine response in vitreous of TBU patients (intermediate or posterior uveitis) [56]. The major fraction of infiltrating T cells included CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. These T lymphocytes were found to be recently activated, and released IL-17A and IFN-γ (proinflammatory cytokines) in the vitreous. The higher level of these cytokines in the vitreous than in peripheral blood of these patients suggested that the antigenic trigger was local rather than systemic in origin. The authors also studied the association of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) with TBU, and found a hypo-responsiveness of activated CD4+ T cells in the vitreous to TLR9 agonist ODN 2216 FITC.

In MSC, the serum cytokine levels were studied at baseline and over a longitudinal follow up in patients who received oral corticosteroids and anti-tubercular therapy (ATT) [57]. Of 12 patients, four developed paradoxical worsening (PW) of choroiditis lesions. As compared to patients with complete healing of lesions (eight patients), those with PW (four patients) had a higher IL-10 at baseline, significantly raised IFN-γ levels at 1 week, and significantly raised TNF-α levels at 3 weeks in the serum, during the time of occurrence of PW. The two groups did not differ in TGF-ß levels. This indicated that the pro-inflammatory cytokines increased in the serum during the event of PW due to a higher bacillary load. These cytokines could serve as markers in predicting the treatment outcome with ATT and steroids in patients with TBMSC. A higher mycobacterial antigenic load at baseline may predispose TBMSC patients to develop PW, who demonstrate an increased immune response after initiating ATT.

Pathogenesis: molecular and histopathological aspects

The molecular and histopathological findings of TBSLC have been demonstrated in clinicopathological reports, as well as in animal models [19, 20, 43, 48, 49, 58, 59]. Bansal et al. used three different molecular techniques (multitargeted PCR for MTB assay, Gene Xpert MTB/RIF assay, and a line probe assay) and detected MTB genome in vitreous fluid of eyes with TBSLC [19]. This study was the first to report rifampicin resistance in eyes with TBSLC.

In an enucleated eye with panuveitis of unknown cause, histological sections of the globe revealed inflammation (granulomatous) of the uveal tissue and retina [20]. The RPE showed necrosis, with acid-fast bacilli sequestered within the RPE cells, suggesting that RPE was the preferred site for localization of MTB in eyes with panuveitis or tubercular choroiditis (TBSLC). These sequestered bacilli in the RPE represent the phagocytosed bacilli (as in macrophages in pulmonary TB), which thrive by avoiding phagolysosome fusion. Their reactivation in the RPE probably results in recurrence of TB SLC.

Kawali et al. reported clinicopathologic features of TB SLC in a 28-year-old male. Following progression of macular choroiditis upon initiating ATT, the patient underwent a vitreous and chorioretinal biopsy [43]. The biopsy revealed caseous necrosis and granulomatous inflammation of the inner choroid, with degeneration of RPE and disruption of photoreceptors. This case probably represented the histopathologic findings of PW (previously unknown) in TBSLC.

Experimental choroiditis (besides other types of uveitis) developed in rabbit eyes following injection of living tubercle bacilli into the common carotid artery, as reported by Finoff in 1924 [48]. While majority of animals developed some form of systemic TB, all 46 animals developed ocular lesions, on the side injected. Clinically, the choroidal lesions manifested as ill-defined, oval, yellow patches, and healed to the atrophic stage with pigmentary changes. Histologically, the choroid was infiltrated with epithelioid cells, with clumps of bacilli seen centrally, without involvement of RPE in the early stages. Subsequently, with RPE degeneration and proliferation, pigment granules invaded retina. Later, the retina became completely atrophic over the lesion area, with caseation in the centre. This study proved the hematogenous origin of ocular TB, beginning in the iris, then cornea, followed by conjunctiva and lids, and finally the choroid.

In mouse RPE cells, NLRP3-dependent caspase-1 activation and inflammasome priming was induced by two constituents (ESAT-6 and double stranded mycobacterial RNA) of viable MTB [49]. In tissue sections of human ocular TB, both retina and RPE demonstrated NLRP3 staining. This study reported immunolocalization of NLRP3 and double stranded mycobacterial RNA in human ocular TB sections.

Clinical features

Young to middle-aged healthy males are more frequently affected. The choroiditis lesions of SLC or MSC evolve as multifocal lesions, affecting the retinal periphery as well as posterior pole. They begin as discrete lesions, and spread in a serpiginoid pattern to become confluent. Healing of the lesions starts from the centre. Inflammation of the vitreous is common, and anterior segment is seldom involved. Occasionally, placoid and solitary lesions may be seen. The affected eyes usually have both active as well as healed lesions. Healed lesions show scarring and RPE atrophy with prominent underlying choroidal vessels. Hyperpigmentation of the scars is a feature of long duration of the disease, with or without subretinal fibrosis. Final visual acuity is generally preserved as the fovea escapes extensive pigmentation and scarring.

Retinal vasculitis, cystoid macular edema and optic disc edema are some of the rare associations, which may co-exist in the same eye with MSC [14, 22].

In contrast, SC affects elderly patients, and the choroiditis lesion in SC (autoimmune) is large, solitary and juxtapapillary. Vitritis is minimal or none. Tubercular MFC frequently shows multifocal, confluent lesions (that are non-contiguous to optic disc) in posterior pole as well as periphery, with vitreous cells.

Fundus imaging

Fundus imaging at baseline is important to document the extent of involvement, and helps to monitor the response to therapy at follow up. The outcome of MSC lesions (resolution, progression or recurrence) is best seen through digital fundus photography. Wide-field imaging (Fig. 1) is evolving as the preferred modality for capturing peripheral lesions of MSC [60, 61].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Ultra widefield fundus photograph of an eye with tubercular serpiginouslike choroiditis

Full size image

An initial (Fig. 2a) hypofluorescence and late (Fig. 2b) hyperfluorescence (with ill-defined border) on fundus fluorescein angiography (FA) suggests active lesions. Healed lesions show transmission defects due to RPE loss, appear well demarcated with staining of sharp edges [62, 63]. Hypocyanescence in early (Fig. 3a) as well as intermediate (Fig. 3b) phases is a feature of active lesions on indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), which persists as hypocyanescence in late phase, or becomes isocyanescence [62, 64]. The ICG is superior to fundus examination and FA in identifying subclinical active lesions [65, 66].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Color fundus photograph showing active lesions of TB SLC (left panel). Fluorescein angiography in early phase a showing transmission hyperfluorescence in the centre of lesions (white arrows) corresponding to healed lesions and hypofluorescence along the border of lesions (red arrows) corresponding to active lesions. The late phase b shows transmission hyperfluorescence persisting in the centre of lesions (white arrows) corresponding to healed lesions and hyperfluorescence along the border of lesions (red arrows) corresponding to active lesions

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Color fundus photograph showing predominantly healed lesions of TB SLC (top panel) and a few subtle active lesions (white arrow). Combined fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography in early phase a shows hypofluorescence (white arrow) and hypocyanescence (red arrow) along the active lesion. Late phase b shows hyperfluorescence (white arrow) and persisting hypocyanescence (red arrow)

Full size image

Fundus autofluorescence (FAF), based on the property of fluorescence of lipofuscin, is extremely crucial in MSC [18, 21]. It has the advantage of being a non-invasive, and a quick modality, when compared to conventional FA and ICGA. It is much more reliable (than clinical examination, FA or ICGA) when active lesions are just evolving and subtle, or when treated lesions are healing. Typically, a new active lesion evolves through four stages of FAF in tubercular MSC as it heals completely. In stage I (acute), an ill-defined, diffuse halo of hyper autofluorescence corresponds to the active lesion (Fig. 4a). In stage II (subacute), a thin hypoautofluorescent rim appears at the border of the lesion as it begins to heal. The central hyperautofluorescence becomes prominent (Fig. 4b). In stage III, as the central hyper autofluorescence decreases and peripheral hypoautofluorescence increases, the lesion appears stippled (Fig. 4c). In stage IV, with complete healing of the lesion over several months, there is generalized hypo autofluorescence, which becomes intense as scarring sets in with time (Fig. 4d).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Color fundus photograph (left panel) showing active lesions of TBSLC and fundus autofluorescence (right panel) showing stage I (acute) lesions (blue arrows), characterized by an ill-defined, diffuse halo of hyper autofluorescence along the active lesion (a). In stage II (subacute), a thin hypoautofluorescent rim (blue arrows) appears at the border of the lesion as it begins to heal, and the central hyperautofluorescence becomes prominent (b). In stage III, as the central hyper autofluorescence decreases and peripheral hypoautofluorescence increases (blue arrows), the lesion appears stippled (c). In stage IV, with complete healing of the lesion over several months, there is generalized hypo autofluorescence (blue arrows) (d)

Full size image

These FAF changes correlate with changes in outer retinal layers (RPE, photoreceptors, external limiting membrane and outer nuclear layer) as reflected on high-resolution spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) [21]. Enhanced-depth imaging (EDI) OCT reveals diffuse choroidal thickening in acute stages of MSC [67]. On healing, the choroid below the MSC lesions becomes atrophic, while the choroid underneath the unaffected retina returns to normal thickness and contour. The OCT also aids in detecting associated complications (choroidal neovascular membrane, cystoid macular edema, macular scar, epiretinal membrane, etc.)

Investigations

The diagnosis of tubercular SLC is often clinical. Additionally, a history of living in TB-endemic areas, or contact with a person with TB, aids in strengthening the diagnosis. Corroborative evidence is obtained by a positive tuberculin skin test, or a positive QuantiFERON-TB Gold (Cellestis, Carnegie, Victoria, Australia) test, and/or radiological (chest X-ray or chest CT scan) evidence of TB elsewhere in the body [15,16,17, 68,69,70]. Though an expensive test, PET-CT may be ordered to detect a systemic focus of TB [71,72,73]. Detection of tubercular DNA in intraocular fluids by PCR provides a definitive diagnosis of tubercular etiology in MSC [19, 20].

Treatment

Systemic corticosteroids are the mainstay of therapy to control active inflammation, while ATT helps to reduce recurrence of inflammatory attacks [13,14,15, 19]. In patients who develop paradoxical worsening of inflammation a few weeks following the initiation of ATT, an increase in the dose of systemic corticosteroids controls inflammation [26]. Immunosuppressive agents are used in cases with relentless progression, or recurrent choroiditis [19]. Intravitreal steroids (sustained release dexamethasone implant) are an option for unilateral cases or to avoid side effects of systemic steroids, or as an adjunct with conventional oral corticosteroids and ATT [74].

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Hamilton AM, Bird AC (1974) Geographical choroidopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 58:784–797

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Babel J (1983) Geographic and helicoid choroidopathies. Clinical and angiographic study; attempted classification. J Fr Ophtalmol 6:981–993

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abu el-Asrar AM (1995) Serpiginous (geographical) choroiditis. Int Ophthalmol Clin 35:87–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lim WK, Buggage RR, Nussenblatt RB (2005) Serpiginous choroiditis. Surv Ophthalmol 50:231–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Edelsten C, Stanford MR, Graham ER (1994) Serpiginous choroiditis: an unusual presentation of ocular sarcoidosis. Br J Ophthalmol 78:70–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Fiore PM, Friedman AH (1988) Unusual chorioretinal degeneration associated with sarcoidosis. Am J Ophthalmol 106:490–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ugarte M, Wearne IM (2002) Serpiginous choroidopathy: an unusual association with Crohn’s disease. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 30:437–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pinto Ferreira F, Faria A, Ganhao F (1995) Periarteritis nodosa with initial ocular involvement. J Fr Ophtalmol 18:788–793

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fuentes-Paez G, Celis-Sanchez J, Torres J et al (2005) Serpiginous choroiditis in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 14:928–929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rattray KM, Cole MD, Smith SR (2000) Systemic non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma presenting as a serpiginous choroidopathy: report of a case and review of literature. Eye 14:706–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mulder CJ, Pena AS, Jansen J et al (1983) Celiac disease and geographic (serpiginous) choroidopathy with occurrence of thrombocytopenic purpura. Arch Intern Med 143:842

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta V, Agarwal A, Gupta A et al (2002) Clinical characteristics of serpiginous choroidopathy in North India. Am J Ophthalmol 134:47–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta V, Gupta A, Arora S et al (2003) Presumed tubercular serpiginous-like choroiditis: clinical presentations and management. Ophthalmology 110:1744–1749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bansal R, Gupta A, Gupta V, Dogra MR, Sharma A, Bambery P (2012) Tubercular serpiginous-like choroiditis presenting as multifocal serpiginoid choroiditis. Ophthalmology 119(11):2334–2342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bansal R, Gupta A, Gupta V et al (2008) Role of anti-tubercular therapy in uveitis with latent/manifest tuberculosis. Am J Ophthalmol 146:772–779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta A, Bansal R, Gupta V et al (2010) Ocular signs predictive of tubercular uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol 149:562–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mackensen F, Becker MD, Wiehler U et al (2008) QuantiFERON TB-gold—A new test strengthening long-suspected tuberculous involvement in serpiginous-like choroiditis. Am J Ophthalmol 146:761–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gupta A, Bansal R, Gupta V, Sharma A (2012) Fundus autofluorescence in serpiginous-like choroiditis. Retina 32:814–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bansal R, Sharma K, Gupta A, Sharma A, Singh MP, Gupta V, Mulkutkar S, Dogra M, Dogra MR, Kamal S, Sharma SP, Fiorella PD (2015) Detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis genome in vitreous fluid of eyes with multifocal serpiginoid choroiditis. Ophthalmology. 122(4):840–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rao NA, Saraswathy S, Smith RE (2006) Tuberculous uveitis: distribution of mycobacterium tuberculosis in the retinal pigment epithelium. Arch Ophthalmol 124:1777–1779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bansal R, Kulkarni P, Gupta A et al (2011) High-resolution spectral domain optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence correlation in tubercular serpiginouslike choroiditis. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect 1:157–163

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Nayak S, Basu S, Singh MK (2011) Presumed tubercular retinal Vasculitis with serpiginous-like choroiditis in the other eye. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 19:361–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Znaor L, Medic A, Karaman K, Perkovic D (2011) Serpiginous-like choroiditis as sign of intraocular tuberculosis. Med Sci Monit 17(7):CS88–CS90

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Vasconcelos-Santos DV, Rao PK, Davies JB et al (2010) Clinical features of tuberculous Serpiginouslike choroiditis in contrast to classic serpiginous choroiditis. Arch Ophthalmol 128(7):853–858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gan WL, Jones NP (2013) Serpiginouslike choroiditis as a marker for tuberculosis in a non-endemic area. Br J Ophthalmol 97:644–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta V, Bansal R, Gupta A (2011) Continuous progression of tubercular serpiginous-like choroiditis after initiating Antituberculosis treatment. Am J Ophthalmol 152:857–863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gupta V, Gupta A, Rao NA (2007) Intraocular tuberculosis- an update. Surv Ophthalmol 52(6):561–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mahendradas P, Kamath G, Mahalakshmi B et al (2007) Serpiginous choroiditis-like picture due to ocular toxoplasmosis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 15:127–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Priya K, Madhavan HN, Reiser BJ et al (2002) Association of herpes-viruses in the aqueous humor of patients with serpiginous choroiditis: a polymerase chain reaction-based study. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 10:253–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rodman J, Pizzimenti J (2011) Serpiginous choroiditis in a herpes-positive patient. Optom Vis Sci 88:776–780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pisa D, Ramos M, Garcia P et al (2008) Fungal infection in patients with serpiginous choroiditis or acute zonal occult outer retinopathy. J Clin Microbiol 41:130–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Thomas S, Wiselka M, Dhar J, Bibby K (2006) Syphilis presenting as acute multifocal retinochoroiditis. J R Soc Med 99:371–372

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Portero A, Careno E, Real LA, Villaron S, Herreras JM (2012) Infectious nontuberculous serpiginous choroiditis. Arch Ophthalmol 130:1207–1208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Providencia J, Fonseca C, Henriques F, Proenca R (2020) Serpiginous choroiditis presenting after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A new immunological trigger? Eur J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120977817

  35. de Souza EC, de Campos VE, Duker JS (2021) Atypical unilateral multifocal choroiditis in a COVID-19 positive patient. Am J Ophthalmol Case Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2021.101034

  36. Tom ES, McKay KM, Saraf SS (2021) Bilateral ampiginous choroiditis following presumed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med 2021:1646364. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1646364

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Kawali A, Bavaharan B, Sanjay S, Mohan A, Mahendradas P, Shetty R (2020) Serpiginous-like choroiditis (SLC) – morphology and treatment outcomes. Ocular Immunol Inflamm 28(4):667–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Agrawal R, Testi I, Mahajan S, Yuen YS, Agarwal A, Kon OM (2021) COTS consensus group, et al. collaborative ocular tuberculosis study consensus guidelines on the Management of Tubercular Uveitis—Report 1. Guidelines for initiating Antitubercular therapy in tubercular choroiditis. Ophthalmology 128(2):266–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hutchinson J (1900) Serpiginous choroiditis in scrofulous subjects: choroidal lupus. Arch Surg (Lond) 11:126–135

    Google Scholar 

  40. Erkkilä H, Laatikainen L, Jokinen E (1982) Immunological studies on serpiginous choroiditis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 219:131–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. King DG, Grizzard WS, Sever RJ, Espinoza L (1990) Serpiginous choroidopathy associated with elevated factor VIII-von Willebrand factor antigen. Retina 10:97–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Broekhuyse RM, van Herck M, Pinckers AJ, Winkens HJ, van Vugt AH, Ryckaert S et al (1988) Immune responsiveness to retinal S-antigen and opsin in serpiginous choroiditis and other retinal diseases. Doc Ophthalmol 69:83–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kawali A, Emerson GG, Naik NK, Sharma K, Mahendradas P, Rao NA et al (2018) Clinicopathologic features of tuberculous serpiginous-like choroiditis. JAMA Ophthalmol 136:219–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Forrester JV, Kuffova L, Dick AD (2018) Autoimmunity, autoinflammation and infection in uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol 189:77–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tripathi P, Saxena S, Yadav VS, Naik S, Singh VK (2004) Human S-antigen: peptide determinant recognition in uveitis patients. Exp Mol Pathol 76:122–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. de Smet MD, Bitar G, Mainigi S, Nussenblatt RB (2001) Human S-antigen determinant recognition in uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:3233–3238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tagirasa R, Parmar S, Barik MR, Devadas S, Basu S (2017) Autoreactive T cells in immunopathogenesis of TB-associated uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 58:5682–5691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Finoff WC (1924) Changes found in eyes of rabbits following injection of living tubercle bacilli into the common carotid artery. Am J Ophthalmol 7:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Basu S, Fowler BJ, Kerur N, Arnvig KB, Rao NA (2018) NLRP3 inflammasome activation by mycobacterial ESAT-6 and dsRNA in intraocular tuberculosis. Microb Pathog 114:219–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Billiau A, Matthys P (2001) Modes of action of Freund’s adjuvants in experimental models of autoimmune diseases. J Leukoc Biol 70(6):849–860

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Pepple KL, Rotkis L, Van Grol J, Wilson L, Sandt A, Lam DL, Carlson E, Van Gelder RN (2015) Primed mycobacterial uveitis (PMU): histological and cytokine characterization of a model of uveitis in rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56(13):8438–8448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Cheng CK, Berger AS, Pearson PA, Ashton P, Jaffe GJ (1995) Intravitreal sustained-release dexamethasone device in the treatment of experimental uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36(2):442–453

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Basu S, Elkington P, Rao NA (2020) Pathogenesis of ocular tuberculosis: new observations and future directions. Tuberculosis 124:101961

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Abu El-Asrar AM, Struyf S, Kangave D et al (2012) Cytokine and CXC chemokine expression patterns in aqueous humor of patients with presumed tuberculous uveitis. Cytokine 59:377–381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ang M, Cheung G, Vania M et al (2012) Aqueous cytokine and chemokine analysis in uveitis associated with tuberculosis. Mol Vis 18:565–573

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Sharma RK, Gupta A, Kamal S et al (2016) Role of regulatory T cells in tubercular uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 26:27–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Agarwal A, Deokar A, Sharma R, Singh N, Aggarwal K, Sharma SP, Singh R, Sharma A, Sharma K, Agrawal R, Bansal R, Gupta V (2019) Longitudinal analysis of serum cytokine profile among patients with tubercular multifocal serpiginoid choroiditis: a pilot study. Eye 33:129–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Rao NA, Albini TA, Kumaradas M, Pinn ML, Fraig MM, Karakousis PC (2009) Experimental ocular tuberculosis in guinea pigs. Arch Ophthalmol 127:1162–1166

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Wroblewski KJ, Hidayat AA, Neafie RC, Rao NA, Zapor M (2011) Ocular tuberculosis: a clinicopathologic and molecular study. Ophthalmology 118:772–777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Aggarwal K, Agarwal A, Deokar A, Singh R, Bansal R, Sharma A, Sharma K, Dogra MR, Gupta V (2019) Ultra-wide field imaging in paradoxical worsening of tubercular multifocal Serpiginoid choroiditis after the initiation of anti-tubercular therapy. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 27(3):365–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Aggarwal K, Mulkutkar S, Mahajan S, Singh R, Sharma A, Bansal R, Gupta V, Gupta A (2016 Dec) Role of ultra-wide field imaging in the Management of Tubercular Posterior Uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 24(6):631–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Bansal R, Gupta A, Gupta V (2012) Imaging in the diagnosis and management of serpiginous choroiditis. Int Ophthal Clin 52:229–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Schatz M, Maumenee AE, Patz A (1974) Geographic helicoid peripapillary choroidopathy: clinical presentation and fluorescein angiographic findings. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 78:747–761

    Google Scholar 

  64. Wolfensberger TJ, Piguet B, Herbort CP (1999) Indocyanine green angiographic features in tuberculous chorioretinitis. Am J Ophthalmol 127:350–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Giovannini A, Mariotti C, Ripa E et al (1996) Indocyanine green angiographic findings in serpiginous choroidopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 80:436–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Giovannini A, Ripa E, Scassellati-Sforzolini B et al (1996) Indocyanine green angiography in serpiginous choroidopathy. Eur J Ophthalmol 6:299–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Moharana B, Bansal R, Singh R, Sharma A, Gupta V, Gupta A (2019) Enhanced depth imaging by high-resolution spectral domain optical coherence tomography in tubercular multifocal serpiginoid choroiditis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 27(5):781–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Bansal R, Gupta A, Agarwal R, Dogra M, Bhutani G, Gupta V, Dogra MR, Katoch D, Aggarwal AN, Sharma A, Nijhawan R, Nada R, Nahar Saikia U, Dey P, Behera D (2019) Role of CT chest and cytology in differentiating tuberculosis from presumed sarcoidosis in uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 27(7):1041–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Ganesh SK, Roopleen BJB, Veena N (2011) Role of high-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) of the chest in granulomatous uveitis: A tertiary uveitis clinic experience from India. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 19:51–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Mehta S (2004) Utility of computed chest tomography (CT scan) in recurrent uveitis. Ind J Ophthalmol 52:321–322

    Google Scholar 

  71. Doycheva D, Deuter C, Hetzel J et al (2011) The use of positron emission tomography/CT in the diagnosis of tuberculosis-associated uveitis. Br J Ophthalmol 95:1290–1295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Mehta S (2018) Observed patterns of systemic disease on PET/CT scan in patients with presumed ocular tuberculosis: findings and hypotheses. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 26(2):217–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Mehta S (2012) Patterns of systemic uptake of 18-FDG with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) studies in patients with presumed ocular tuberculosis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 20(6):434–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Agarwal A, Handa S, Aggarwal K, Sharma M, Singh R, Sharma A, Agrawal R, Sharma K, Gupta V (2018) The role of dexamethasone implant in the management of tubercular uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 26(6):884–892

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Advanced Eye Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India

    Reema Bansal & Vishali Gupta

Authors
  1. Reema Bansal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vishali Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RB prepared and drafted the manuscript. VG read and approved the final manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reema Bansal.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bansal, R., Gupta, V. Tubercular serpiginous choroiditis. J Ophthal Inflamm Infect 12, 37 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12348-022-00312-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12348-022-00312-3

Keywords