- Brief report
A typical bilateral Toxoplasma retinochoroiditis in a bone marrow transplant patient with negative serum titers
Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infectionvolume 3, Article number: 23 (2013)
Toxoplasma retinochoroiditis can have an atypical presentation and be difficult to diagnose in immunocompromised patients. Accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment is important since the disease can be aggressive in these patients. This paper is a case report with literature review, emphasizing on the diagnosis and treatment of Toxoplasma retinochoroiditis.
A 27-year-old male with chronic myelogenous leukemia with history of bone marrow transplantation presented with floaters in his right eye. Fundus exam showed bilateral, multifocal retinochoroiditis with subsequent development of a mild vitritis. Serum cytomegalovirus and toxoplasmosis antibody titers and syphilis screen were negative. Aqueous polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis revealed the presence of Toxoplasma gondii DNA OU. Clindamycin (1.0 mg/0.1 mL) was injected bilateral intravitreal OU twice at 4 days apart with subsequent resolution of retinochoroiditis.
When evaluating retinochoroiditis in an immunocompromised patient, one must keep a high index of suspicion for atypical presentations of well-known disease entities. Aqueous and vitreous samples for PCR can be useful in obtaining an accurate diagnosis and therefore provide appropriate management for the patient. Intravitreal clindamycin is an option for treatment in these patients.
An immunocompromised patient presented with floaters and fundus lesions suspicious for infectious retinochoroiditis vs. chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) relapse. Despite negative serum toxoplasmosis titers, an aqueous polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis revealed ocular toxoplasmosis bilaterally and the patient responded to therapy. We discuss clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, and various treatment options in the management of Toxoplasma retinochoroiditis. All research for this brief report was done with appropriate ethical approval from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine Institutional Review Board and informed consent was obtained from the subject.
A 27-year-old male with history of CML on remission since treatment with imatinib, chemoradiation, and allogenic bone marrow transplantation 1 year prior to consultation and with active and recurrent acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex stomatosis presented with a 2-day history of floaters in his right eye. Patient’s medications included several immunosuppressive agents such as tacrolimus, sirolimus, and mycophenolate along with the prophylactic medications, atovaquone, valacyclovir, and ciprofloxacin. Visual acuity was 20/30 +3 and 20/100 in the right and left eyes, respectively. Fundus examination of the right eye revealed irregular, fluffy, white subretinal and intraretinal lesions with pigmentary changes in the superotemporal arcade (Figure 1a). In the left eye, a smaller similar lesion was noted just inferotemporally to the optic nerve with adjacent retinal edema involving the macula. No vitritis was noted bilaterally. Differential diagnosis included viral retinochoroiditis (cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), and varicella zoster virus (VZV)) vs. CML relapse vs. atypical toxoplasmosis (Figure 1b).
Serum IgM and IgG titers for CMV and toxoplasmosis were negative in addition to syphilis screening being negative. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis was negative for CMV, HSV, toxoplasmosis via PCR, and bacterial growth. CSF analysis also showed atypical cells with no blasts indicating no evidence of CML relapse. MRI brain/orbits showed no abnormalities. Intravenous cidofovir had recently been started for HSV stomatitis, and the patient was initially observed on this treatment.
Two weeks after presentation, visual acuity decreased to 20/70 OD and 20/400 OS. Examination revealed progression of the retinal lesions with a mild vitritis (Figure 2). The clinical picture was highly suspicious for CMV retinitis; however, the negative serum CMV PCR and progression of lesions on cidofovir raised serious doubt. An anterior chamber paracentesis was performed, and the aqueous humor was sent for PCR for CMV, HSV, VZV, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and toxoplasmosis. A more aggressive treatment of the CMV retinitis was also pursued with bilateral intravitreal injections of foscarnet in addition to intravenous route.
Five days later, quantitative PCR analysis revealed 3,400 DNA copies/ml OD and 2,800 DNA copies/ml OS of Toxoplasma gondii and negative PCR for HSV, VZV, EBV, and CMV OU. A diagnosis of Toxoplasma retinochorioditis was made. Clindamycin (1.0 mg/0.1 mL) was injected intravitreally OU twice at 4 days apart. Over the next month, the active areas of retinochoroiditis regressed followed by gliosis of the lesions with pigmentary changes (Figure 3a,b). The vision subsequently improved to 20/50 OD and 20/100 OS. Patient was also started on trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole to prevent future reactivation of the disease.
This case report describes a patient with Toxoplasma retinochoroiditis masquerading as a viral infection in a patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia. Initial clinical examination and laboratory values lead to a presumptive diagnosis of a viral retinochorioditis, and treatment with both intravitreal and systemic foscarnet was initiated in addition to oral cidofovir. Disease progression was noted with the increasing size of the retinal lesions. Diagnostic aqueous tap sent for PCR analysis confirmed the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis and the patient was successfully treated with intravitreal injections of clindamycin.
It may be difficult to clinically distinguish toxoplasmosis infection among the different causes of infectious retinochoroiditis; however, such a distinction has important therapeutic implications. It has been described that when contrasted to CMV retinochoroiditis, retinal lesions of toxoplasmosis are thicker and more densely opaque with smooth and non-granular lesion borders which are often associated with a chorioretinal scar . Subretinal fluid in association with retinochoroiditis is more commonly seen in toxoplasmosis . Prominent inflammatory reactions, anterior and posterior, are a hallmark of Toxoplasma retinochoroiditis . However, in immunocompromised patients, the inflammatory reaction may not be as robust, thereby diminishing the sensitivity of this difference. Additionally, one of the most interesting aspects of this case was the negative serum and CSF toxoplamosis serology, which swayed the diagnosis away, until the results of the aqueous PCR were received. Again, the negative serology may have been due to the poor immune function of this patient with a history of CML s/p bone marrow transplantation. Furthermore, the rapid progression of the disease process in this patient is atypical for toxoplasmosis. Toxoplasmosis may present bilaterally with rapid progression, without impressive inflammation and a negative serum serology, in immunocompromised patients. Thus, a high index of suspicion is needed to make the diagnosis of Toxoplasma retinochoroiditis in such patients.
Treatment for this patient was with two sets of bilateral intravitreal injections of clindamycin (1.0 mg/0.1 mL). It has been shown that intravitreal clindamycin plus dexamethasone has similar outcomes to classic therapy (pyrimethamine, sulfadiazine, and prednisolone) for Toxoplasma retinochoroiditis in terms of the ability to reduce lesion size and vitreal inflammation as well as improve visual acuity [3, 4]. Because of issues with follow-up, the two injections were given 4 days apart. The patient responded to only two injections so well, that he was simply observed at that point.
Oral clindamycin has also been used in the treatment of Toxoplasma retinochoroiditis. Some use it as part of a quadruple therapy in immunocompetent patients, which consists of classic therapy plus oral clindamycin . It has also been shown that oral clindamycin alone is effective in treating Toxoplasma retinochoroiditis with minimal side effects .
Intravitreal administration of clindamycin has advantages over classic therapy due to its reduced side effect profile. Intravitreal injections of clindamycin deliver a high concentration of the medicine to the intraocular tissues while reducing systemic absorption and unwanted systemic side effects. Additionally, the clindamycin’s good intracellular penetration makes it a good antimicrobial choice for the intracellular T. gondii. Several studies have shown clindamycin to be non-toxic to the retina . Nevertheless, the risks of an intravitreal injection itself do remain including endophthalmitis and retinal detachment [7, 8]. Furthermore, intravitreal clindamycin will only treat the ophthalmic disease, but it will not treat nor prevent systemic reactivation of toxoplasmosis.
Another appropriate treatment for ocular toxoplasmosis is trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX). It has been shown that TMP-SMX has similar efficacy in terms of reduction in the retinal lesion size and improvement in visual acuity and has preferred side effect profile compared to pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine . Given as an oral medication, it will provide prophylaxis for systemic reactivation of the disease as well.
Multiple different regimens have been shown to be effective in treating toxoplasmosis retinochoroiditis in immunocompromised patients, none of which proving to be superior. In contrast to immunocompromised patients in whom treatment is crucial, it is not established that immunocompetent patients require therapy.
Toxoplasmosis should be included in the differential diagnosis of a retinochoroiditis in an immunocompromised patient even if it presents without the typical inflammatory response, an adjacent chorioretinal scar, typical retinitis, or is bilaterally active. If the CSF and serum serologies are negative, this should not sway the diagnosis away from toxoplasmosis in the immunocompromised patients. One should consider an aqueous tap for PCR analysis to aid in the diagnosis of the disease process. Once the diagnosis is confirmed, appropriate therapy may be promptly instituted in hopes of preserving the maximal vision.
Elkins BS, Holland GN, Opremcak EM, Dunn JP Jr, Jabs DA, Johnston WH, Green WR: Ocular toxoplasmosis misdiagnosed as cytomegalovirus retinopathy in immunocompromised patients. Ophthalmology 1994,101(3):499–507.
Diniz B, Regatieri C, Andrade R, Maia A: Evaluation of spectral domain and time domain optical coherence tomography findings in toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis. Clin Ophthalmol 2011, 5: 645–650.
Soheilian M, Ramezani A, Azimzadeh A, Sadoughi MM, Dehghan MH, Shahghadami R, Yaseri M, Peyman GA: Randomized trial of intravitreal clindamycin and dexamethasone versus pyrimethamine, sulfadiazine, and prednisolone in treatment of ocular toxoplasmosis. Ophthalmology 2011,118(1):134–141. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.04.020
Lasave AF, Díaz-Llopis M, Muccioli C, Belfort R Jr, Arevalo JF: Intravitreal clindamycin and dexamethasone for zone 1 toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis at twenty-four months. Ophthalmology 2010,117(9):1831–1838. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.028
De-la-Torre A, Stanford M, Curi A, Jaffe GJ, Gomez-Marin JE: Therapy for ocular toxoplasmosis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2011,19(5):314–320. 10.3109/09273948.2011.608915
Lakhanpal V, Schocket SS, Nirankari VS: Clindamycin in the treatment of toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis. Am J Ophthalmol 1983,95(5):605–613.
Choopong P, Tesavibul N, Rodanant N: Crystallization after intravitreal ganciclovir injection. Clin Ophthalmol 2010, 4: a709-a711.
Sobrin L, Kump LI, Foster CS: Intravitreal clindamycin for toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis. Retina 2007,27(7):952–957. 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31804b3f0d
Sadoughi MM, Soheilian M, Ghajarnia M, Dehghan MH, Yazdani S, Behboudi H, Anisian A, Peyman GA: Prospective randomized trial of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole versus pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine in the treatment of ocular toxoplasmosis. Ophthalmology 2005,112(11):1876–1882. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.05.025
This study was funded in part from a Research to Prevent Blindness Foundation with unrestricted institutional grant award.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
AH drafted the manuscript and compiled a literature search. RP, DL, UM, and DG all played a role in clinical diagnosis and treatment decision making as well as editing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.