- Brief report
- Open Access
Successful treatment of corneal wasp sting-induced panuveitis with vitrectomy
© Nakatani et al.; licensee Springer. 2013
- Received: 10 September 2012
- Accepted: 12 September 2012
- Published: 21 January 2013
This study aims to present the management and clinical findings of a case of corneal wasp sting and to report the outcome of corneal change and panuveitis after vitrectomy.
Clinical findings, anterior segment photographs, corneal endothelial changes, and medical treatment of corneal wasp sting-induced panuveitis are presented. A 95-year-man was stung by a wasp on his left cornea. A severe conjunctival hyperemia, marked corneal edema, corneal epithelial defect, and uveitis developed. As soon as the patient visited our clinic, topical corticosteroid and antibiotics were given, but corneal endothelial damage and uveitis did not improve. Anterior chamber irrigation was performed with oxiglutatione solution to rinse out the wasp venom. Corneal edema and anterior uveitis improved but the endothelial cell density gradually decreased and the vitreous opacity deteriorated. Therefore, a 23-gauge vitrectomy was performed. Subsequently, the corneal edema and panuveitis improved.
Vitrectomy may be an effective treatment for corneal endothelial damage and endophthalmitis induced by a corneal wasp sting.
- Corneal wasp sting
- Endothelial cell analysis
Wasp sting of the cornea is a relatively rare injury. Various cases describing corneal bee or wasp stings have been reported. Wasp venom contains up to 13 different antigens. Serotonin causes multiple effects through 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptors, including an intense localized vascular spasm. In addition, wasp venom contains phospholipase A, phospholipase B, and mastoparan peptide, which can cause direct mast cell degranulation with the release of histamine. Sudden release of histamine in the venom causes vasodilatation, an increase in capillary permeability, and a type 1 hypersensitivity immunological response mediated by immunoglobulin E [1–7]. Clinical course and prognosis ranged from mild to severe damage depending on the type of bee or wasp, depth of injury, and toxic or immunological response to the venom injected by the stinger. Complications reported in the literature were corneal edema, corneal infiltration, anterior uveitis, hyphema, cataract, lens subluxation, and optic neuritis. We report a case of corneal wasp sting which induced a corneal epithelial defect, endothelial damage, anterior uveitis, and panuveitis. To our knowledge, there is a paucity of the reports on the improvement of panuveitis induced by wasp sting after vitrectomy. This research was carried out with the ethical approval of Himi Municipal Hospital.
A 95-year-old man consulted our in hospital with complaint of severe pain resulting from a wasp sting of the left eye that occurred during a logging operation. The patient was examined 1 h after the trauma. Visual acuity corrected by refraction was at the level of hand motion in the left eye and 20/20 in the right eye. There was no significant pathology in the right eye. He had undergone phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation of both his eyes 1 year previously. Visual acuity corrected by refraction of the left eye was 20/20, and the endothelial cell density was 1,753 cell/mm2 after cataract surgery.
The anterior chamber inflammation and vitreous opacity were greatly resolved after surgery. Corneal endothelial cell density was 744 cell/mm2. The flashed electroretinography (ERG) result was normal in both eyes. The postoperative visual acuity of the operated eye was 7/10 with a normal fundus examination 2 months after injury. Aqueous and vitreous samples were not analyzed.
Stings from bees or wasps produce a variety of clinical manifestations [1–7]. In cases of corneal bee sting discussed in the literature, corneal complications have been reported most frequently [2–4]. In all these cases, the corneal edema regressed and infiltrates resulted in a corneal scar 4 to 6 weeks after removal of the stinger and the initiation of treatment. Corneal edema has been explained by cell death caused by activation of the complement cascade by proteins in the bee venom, leading to the production of anaphylotoxins and chemotactic factors [1, 3]. Bee venom is a complex toxin having various impacts and components. It contains two types of biogenic amines: non-enzymatic polypeptide toxins (melittin, apamin, mast cell degranulating peptide) and enzymes (phospholipase A, phospholipase B, hyaluronidase). Ocular inflammation increases capillary protein permeability allowing greater leakage of proteins into the vitreous space.
The difference of wasp sting effects depends on the type of wasp venom involved and whether the venom was injected into the eye. The corneal edema found in cases of wasp sting generally ends with bullous keratopathy . It has been noted that the cause of corneal edema in wasp stings is acetylcholine in the venom . We observed decreased endothelial cell density in the left eye. This finding indicated that the wasp venom contained substances that were toxic to the corneal endothelial cells. In addition, Kitagawa et al. reported a wasp (hornet) sting-induced retinal damage with unrecordable ERG responses . In our patient, ERG was normal after treatment. Unfortunately, we could not capture the species. A hornet sting of the cornea would have been more severe so it was excluded. This was verified following a medical interview of the patient’s companion. Together, the evidence indicated that the offending insect in this case was a paper wasp.
Wasp venom that had invaded through the wound caused inflammation of both the cornea and anterior chamber and also seemed to have passed through the open posterior capsule so that the vitreous was also involved. In our case, corneal edema and panuveitis deteriorated again in spite of anterior chamber irrigation. Toxins or chemotactic factors seemed to accumulate in the vitreous space.
It is difficult to differentiate sterile from infectious endophthalmitis, especially in cases of severe anterior inflammation induced by a toxic substance. Wasp venom may induce bacterial endophthalmitis concurrently with toxic injection. In our case, we did not analyze the anterior chamber aqueous or vitreous for diagnosis of bacterial endophthalmitis. If the clinical manifestation presented infectious endophthalmitis, empirical therapy, such as intravitreal antibiotics (i.e., vancomycin hydrochloride and ceftazidime) by intravitreal injection and/or systemic antibiotics are needed. Our case presented acutely without pain, whereas infectious endophthalmitis typically manifests acutely or subacutely with pain. The pathological condition resembled toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) or toxic endothelial cell destruction syndrome [8, 9]. Therefore, we initially used topical dexamethasone sodium phosphate as a corticosteroid medication for post-traumatic inflammation therapy. Typically, TASS responds well to intense steroidal treatment. However, because steroid and anterior chamber irrigation did not respond well, it was necessary to clean up the toxic substance not only from the anterior chamber, but also from the vitreous space. Wasp venom was deemed to be the cause of panuveitis. Corneal endothelial cell density decreased rapidly despite the instillation of topical corticosteroid. Therefore, we decided to remove the causative substance rapidly from the vitreous space. Early vitrectomy is reported to be useful for the treatment of posterior uveitis  including debridement of the toxins they produce, removal of vitreous membranes, and clearing of vitreous opacity. In our case, early vitrectomy resulted in a good visual outcome.
To our knowledge, improvement of wasp sting-induced panuveitis by vitrectomy has not been reported. Even though corneal wasp stings are not encountered frequently, the ophthalmologist should be aware of the potential complications that include not only corneal endothelial damage, but also panuveitis. Aggressive and early management may be required in the treatment of corneal wasp sting-induced complications.
- Gilboa M, Gdal-On M, Zonis S: Bee and wasp stings of the eye. Retained intralenticular wasp sting: a case report. Br J Ophthalmol 1977, 61: 662–664.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gürlü VP, Erda N: Corneal bee sting-induced endothelial changes. Cornea 2006, 25: 981–983.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen CJ, Richardson CD: Bee sting-induced ocular changes. Ann Ophthalmol 1986, 18: 285–286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Teoh SC, Lee JJ, Fam HB: Corneal honeybee sting. Can J Ophthalmol 2005, 40: 469–471.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Song HS, Wray SH: Bee sting optic neuritis. J Clin Neurophthalmol 1991, 11: 45–49.Google Scholar
- Kitagawa K, Hayasaka S, Setogawa T: Wasp sting-induced retinal damage. Ann Ophthalmol 1993, 25: 157–158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arcieri ES, Franca ET, de Oliveria HB, De Abreu FL, Ferreira MA, Rocha FJ: Ocular lesion arising after stings by hymenopteran insects. Cornea 2002, 21: 328–330.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van Philips LA: Toxic anterior segment syndrome after foldable artiflex iris-fixated phakic intraocular lens implantation. J Ophthalmol 2011, 2011: 982410. 10.1155/2011/982410PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Duffy RE, Brown SE, Caldwell KL, Lubniewski A, Anderson N, Edelhauser H, Holley G, Tess A, Divan H, Helmy M, Arduino M, Jarvis WR: An epidemic of corneal destruction caused by plasma gas sterilization. The Toxic Cell Destruction Syndrome Investigative Team. Arch Ophthalmol 2000, 118: 1167–1176.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Turno-Krecicka A, Misiuk-Hojlo M, Grzybowski A, Oficjalska-Młynczak J, Jakubowska-Kopacz M, Jurowska-Liput J: Early vitrectomy and diagnostic testing in severe infectious posterior uveitis and endophthalmitis. Med Sci Monit 2010, 16: 296–300.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.