- Original Research
- Open Access
The effect of ketorolac on biofilm of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from post-cataract endophthalmitis
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12348-012-0070-1
© The Author(s) 2012
- Received: 9 January 2012
- Accepted: 1 March 2012
- Published: 13 March 2012
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of ketorolac on biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from patients with post-cataract endophthalmitis.
Methods
Forty S. epidermidis strains isolated from postoperative endophthalmitis were used for this study. Biofilms were grown on microtitre plates for 24 h, dyed, and stained with crystal violet. The mean optical density (OD) and the OD ratio (ODr = OD of the treated biofilm/OD of the untreated biofilm) were used for quantification. The biofilms were incubated with 13 mM ketorolac and without ketorolac for controls.
Results
The biofilm ODs of the S. epidermidis isolates untreated and treated with ketorolac were significantly different (0.335 ± 0.06 versus 0.158 ± 0.03, respectively; mean ± SD; P < 0.001). Ketorolac reduced S. epidermidis biofilm formation by 47.6 %.
Conclusions
Ketorolac, at a concentration of 13 mM, significantly reduces the formation of biofilm by strains of S. epidermidis that caused endophthalmitis.
Keywords
- Ketorolac
- NSAIDs
- Endophthalmitis
- Biofilm
- Staphylococcus epidermidis
Introduction
Endophthalmitis is a devastating sight-threatening postsurgical ocular complication. It remains the major concern for all cataract surgeons. Trends in favorable pre- and perioperative prophylaxis practices are difficult to analyze because of the infrequent occurrence of postoperative infection.
Staphylococcus epidermidis is recognized as the most common organism isolated in post-cataract endophthalmitis [1]. We previously found that 75 % of our S. epidermidis post-cataract endophthalmitis strains had the genotypic markers of virulence (icaA, icaD, and mecA) and were biofilm producers [2].
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like sodium salicylate decrease the production of biofilm and bacterial adhesion to contact lenses [3, 4]. Considering that ketorolac is commonly used to prevent ocular inflammation, pain, and miosis in the perioperative period of cataract surgery, we designed an in vitro study to investigate the effect of ketorolac on the formation of biofilm by S. epidermidis.
Methods
Microorganisms
The present study included 40 S. epidermidis strains isolated from postoperative endophthalmitis between the years 2000 and 2008. All isolates were initially identified by classic microbiological and standard biochemical methods. Stock cultures were kept frozen at −75 °C in a brain heart infusion broth containing 25 % glycerol. Two S. epidermidis reference strains were used as controls: the well-known slime-producing strain ATCC 35984 (RP62A) and the non-slime-producing strain ATCC 12228.
Biofilm model
Biofilms were studied using the static microtitre plate model established by Christensen et al. [5]. Ketorolac tris salt (Sigma) was prepared as 2-M stock solutions in PBS.
The S. epidermidis isolates were prepared as follows: an overnight culture grown in trypticase soy broth (TSB) at 37 °C was diluted to 1:100 in TSB. A total of 200 μl of these cell suspensions was transferred to a sterile 96-well polystyrene U-bottom microtitre plate in TSB alone (control group) or in fresh TSB with 13 mM ketorolac added (ketorolac group). The plates were incubated aerobically for 24 h at 37 °C. Media and planktonic cells were removed. Adherent biofilm was fixed with 95 % ethanol and was stained with 100 μl of 1 % (w/v) crystal violet for 5 min. Then, unbound crystal violet was removed, and the wells were washed three times with 300 μl of sterile distilled water. The water was then cleared and the microtitre plate was air-dried for 2 h. The mean optical density (OD) was used for quantification using a routine microtitre plate reader at a wavelength of 570 nm. All biofilm experiments were performed three times for each isolate to minimize the variability in OD measurements. To measure changes in the thickness of the biofilm, a ratio was calculated of the biofilm OD of the isolate incubated with ketorolac against the biofilm OD of the same isolate without ketorolac: (ODR = OD of the treated biofilm/OD of untreated biofilm). The significance of differences (P < 0.05) was assessed using the Mann–Whitney U test.
Results
Effect of ketorolac on S. epidermidis biofilm formation by microplate assay
Strain | OD570 control (mean ± SD) | OD570 (ketorolac) (mean ± SD) | ODR |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.382 ± 0.06 | 0.183 ± 0.03 | 0.479 |
2 | 0.238 ± 0.01 | 0.115 ± 0.01 | 0.483 |
3 | 0.305 ± 0.01 | 0.145 ± 0.06 | 0.475 |
4 | 0.297 ± 0.12 | 0.129 ± 0.03 | 0.434 |
5 | 0.365 ± 0.04 | 0.167 ± 0.07 | 0.457 |
6 | 0.284 ± 0.02 | 0.115 ± 0.04 | 0.405 |
7 | 0.267 ± 0.08 | 0.129 ± 0.01 | 0.483 |
8 | 0.329 ± 0.05 | 0.156 ± 0.08 | 0.474 |
9 | 0.396 ± 0.05 | 0.168 ± 0.05 | 0.424 |
10 | 0.412 ± 0.06 | 0.203 ± 0.09 | 0.493 |
11 | 0.265 ± 0.06 | 0.115 ± 0.04 | 0.434 |
12 | 0.423 ± 0.09 | 0.198 ± 0.11 | 0.469 |
13 | 0.398 ± 0.04 | 0.176 ± 0.06 | 0.442 |
14 | 0.256 ± 0.02 | 0.133 ± 0.04 | 0.519 |
15 | 0.411 ± 0.11 | 0.185 ± 0.02 | 0.450 |
16 | 0.357 ± 0.07 | 0.164 ± 0.04 | 0.459 |
17 | 0.276 ± 0.03 | 0.108 ± 0.05 | 0.391 |
18 | 0.351 ± 0.08 | 0.139 ± 0.01 | 0.444 |
19 | 0.397 ± 0.06 | 0.195 ± 0.01 | 0.491 |
20 | 0.408 ± 0.03 | 0.201 ± 0.03 | 0.493 |
21 | 0.325 ± 0.09 | 0.174 ± 0.04 | 0.535 |
22 | 0.306 ± 0.05 | 0.151 ± 0.04 | 0.493 |
23 | 0.409 ± 0.08 | 0.197 ± 0.08 | 0.482 |
24 | 0.435 ± 0.12 | 0.138 ± 0.01 | 0.317 |
25 | 0.298 ± 0.07 | 0.156 ± 0.05 | 0.523 |
26 | 0.254 ± 0.04 | 0.125 ± 0.02 | 0.492 |
27 | 0.306 ± 0.02 | 0.136 ± 0.04 | 0.444 |
28 | 0.335 ± 0.09 | 0.145 ± 0.02 | 0.433 |
29 | 0.408 ± 0.12 | 0.198 ± 0.13 | 0.485 |
30 | 0.312 ± 0.08 | 0.162 ± 0.04 | 0.519 |
31 | 0.319 ± 0.08 | 0.159 ± 0.09 | 0.498 |
32 | 0.397 ± 0.09 | 0.117 ± 0.01 | 0.295 |
33 | 0.243 ± 0.03 | 0.116 ± 0.03 | 0.477 |
34 | 0.268 ± 0.12 | 0.131 ± 0.05 | 0.489 |
35 | 0.305 ± 0.05 | 0.189 ± 0.06 | 0.620 |
36 | 0.315 ± 0.02 | 0.176 ± 0.02 | 0.559 |
37 | 0.403 ± 0.1 | 0.201 ± 0.05 | 0.5 |
38 | 0.409 ± 0.04 | 0.207 ± 0.06 | 0.506 |
39 | 0.298 ± 0.05 | 0.175 ± 0.06 | 0.587 |
40 | 0.257 ± 0.04 | 0.162 ± 0.07 | 0.630 |
All strains | 0.335 ± 0.06 | 0.158 ± 0.03 | 0.476 ± 0.07 |
The graph shows that ketorolac reduced the biofilm of all strains tested expressed as OD ratio
Discussion
The incidence of post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis varies considerably in the medical literature. An incidence of 1.11 per 1,000 surgeries in the USA has been reported [6], 0.48 per 1,000 surgeries in Sweeden [7], 1.4 per 1,000 surgeries in Canada [8], and 0.49 per 1,000 surgeries in Brazil [9]. Visual outcome after endophthalmitis is generally poor; half the patients of the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study achieved a visual acuity of 20/40 or better by 9 months after treatment [10].
Microorganisms from the ocular and periocular surface may enter the anterior chamber during phacoemulsification, with reported rates of anterior chamber contamination as high as 21 % [11]. In the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study, 70 % of microbiological isolates contained coagulase-negative micrococci [12]. The isolates involved are usually normal flora of the surface of the eye and surrounding mucosa, such as S. epidermidis, which are generally not highly virulent. S. epidermidis has been isolated from 70 % of normal eyes [13].
Biofilm is a microbially derived sessile community characterized by cells that are irreversibly attached to a substratum or interface or to each other, and are embedded in a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances that they have produced exhibiting an altered phenotype with respect to growth rate and gene transcription [14]. Formation of S. epidermidis biofilm is one of the most important virulence factors. Strains isolated from septic patients and prosthetic infections have the ica genes which mediate biofilm formation, and the mecA gene which is related to methicillin resistance. However, saprophytic isolates usually do not have these markers of virulence [15, 16].
This in vitro study shows that ketorolac reduces the formation of biofilm by 47.6 % on all the strains tested. The mechanism by which ketorolac decreased biofilm production was not addressed in this study, and further research is needed for elucidation. The concentration of ketorolac used in our experiment is equivalent to approximately 0.5 % ketorolac, the formulation present in commercially available products. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like salicylic acid and ketorolac can prevent adhesion and bacterial colonization of contact lenses [3]. Salicylic acid inhibited the production of teichoic acid, slime-associated proteins, and polysaccharide/adhesin production by S. epidermidis [17]. The adherence of bacteria to intraocular lenses (IOLs) during implantation and colonization of IOLs appears to have a role in the pathogenesis of postoperative endophthalmitis [18, 19]. Herein is the importance for reducing biofilm production.
Most ophthalmic medications contain benzalkonium chloride as preservative. It has been shown that the presence of benzalkonium chloride at the minimal inhibitory is able to inhibit biofilm formation. However, it was able to induce biofilm development for the S. epidermidis at sub-MIC [20].
The failure of antibiotic treatment of biofilm-associated infections has led to a search for additive measures to eradicate bacteria within biofilms. Our findings support the hypothesis that the use of ketorolac in the perioperative period of cataract surgery may decrease the virulence of S. epidermidis, the most common microorganism involved in post-cataract endophthalmitis. Further studies are needed to prove this effect in vivo.
Conclusion
Ketorolac significantly reduces the formation of biofilm by strains of S. epidermidis that previously caused endophthalmitis. This effect may play a role in a new prophylactic strategy for postoperative endophthalmitis.
Declarations
Financial disclosure
None of the authors have any financial interest in any of the products described in this article.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- Speaker MG, Milch FA, Shah MK et al (1991) Role of external bacterial flora in the pathogenesis of acute postoperative endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology 98:639–649PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- D’Alessandro L, Rossetti S (2002). Genotypic markers of Staphylococcus epidermidis virulence among strains isolated from postoperative endophthalmitis; in ARVO Meeting Abstracts December, p. 4433Google Scholar
- Bandara BM, Sankaridurg PR, Willcox MD (2004) Non-steroidal anti inflammatory agents decrease bacterial colonisation of contact lenses and prevent adhesion to human corneal epithelial cells. Curr Eye Res 29:245–251PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Farber BF, Hsieh HC, Donnenfeld ED et al (1995) A novel antibiofilm technology for contact lens solutions. Ophthalmology 102:831–836PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Younger JJ et al (1985) Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol 22:996–1006PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Keay L, Gower EW, Cassard SD, et al (2012) Postcataract surgery endophthalmitis in the United States analysis of the complete 2003 to 2004 medicare database of cataract surgeries. Ophthalmology (in press)Google Scholar
- Lundstrom M, Wejde G, Stenevi U et al (2007) Endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: a nationwide prospective study evaluating incidence in relation to incision type and location. Ophthalmology 114:866–870PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hatch WV, Cernat G, Wong D et al (2009) Risk factors for acute endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: a population-based study. Ophthalmology 116:425–430PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Melo GB, Bispo PJ, Regatieri CV et al (2010) Incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery (2002–2008) at a Brazilian university-hospital. Arq Bras Oftalmol 73:505–507PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study Group (1995) Results of the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study. A randomized trial of immediate vitrectomy and of intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol 113:1479–1496View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Srinivasan R, Gupta A, Kaliaperumal S et al (2008) Efficacy of intraoperative vancomycin in irrigating solutions on aqueous contamination during phacoemulsification. Indian J Ophthalmol 56:399–402PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Han DP, Wisniewski SR, Wilson LA et al (1996) Spectrum and susceptibilities of microbiologic isolates in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study. Am J Ophthalmol 122:1–17PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Perkins RE, Kundsin RB, Pratt MV et al (1975) Bacteriology of normal and infected conjunctiva. J Clin Microbiol 1:147–149PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Donlan RM, Costerton JW (2002) Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 15:167–193PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Galdbart JO, Allignet J, Tung HS et al (2000) Screening for Staphylococcus epidermidis markers discriminating between skin-flora strains and those responsible for infections of joint prostheses. J Infect Dis 182:351–355PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vandecasteele SJ, Peetermans WE, Merckx R et al (2003) Reliability of the ica, aap and atlE genes in the discrimination between invasive, colonizing and contaminant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates in the diagnosis of catheter-related infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 9:114–119PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Muller E, Al-Attar J, Wolff AG, Farber BF (1998) Mechanism of salicylate-mediated inhibition of biofilm in Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Infect Dis 177:501–503PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kodjikian L, Burillon C, Roques C et al (2003) Bacterial adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis to intraocular lenses: a bioluminescence and scanning electron microscopy study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:4388–4394PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Okajima Y, Kobayakawa S, Tsuji A, Tochikubo T (2006) Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis on intraocular lens material. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:2971–2975PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Houari A, Di MP (2007) Effect of chlorhexidine and benzalkonium chloride on bacterial biofilm formation. Lett Appl Microbiol 45:652–656PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
