Open Access

The value of simple microbiological studies for on-site screening of acute neonatal conjunctivitis in Angola

  • Isabel Alexandre1, 2,
  • Nestor Cortes3,
  • Mar Justel4,
  • Itziar Fernández5, 6,
  • Raul Ortíz de Lejarazu4 and
  • J Carlos Pastor3, 5Email author
Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection20144:1

DOI: 10.1186/1869-5760-4-1

Received: 27 October 2013

Accepted: 7 January 2014

Published: 25 January 2014

Abstract

Background

Neonatal conjunctivitis or ophthalmia neonatorum (ON) is an acute bacterial conjunctivitis contracted by newborns during delivery. In non-industrialized countries, detection of the etiological agent is difficult due to the unavailability of modern diagnostic resources. Therefore, we analyzed the effectiveness of Gram and methylene blue staining techniques, which are simple microbiological methods in suspecting the aetiology of ON in a maternity ward in Luanda, Angola.

Findings

Neonatal conjunctival smears (n = 95), maternal data, and perinatal factors were collected. Slides were air-dried and sent to the Microbiology Department of the Hospital Clinico Universitario, Valladolid, Spain, where trained personnel performed Gram and methylene blue staining methods. Findings were interpreted by two expert microbiologists. Ophthalmological examination of all children showed five newborns with clinical signs of ON. Fourteen mothers reported were suspected with vulvo-vaginitis, and 27 had a urinary infection during pregnancy. Gram staining revealed the presence of epithelial cells in 87.6% and leukocytes in 15% of the conjunctival smears. These values were significantly higher than those shown by methylene blue staining. No rods, cocci, or yeasts were identified by either staining method. Chlamydia trachomatis DNA was also undetected in a small sub-sample with clinical suspicion of ON. There was no correlation among the presence of ON, ON microbes, maternal data, or perinatal factors.

Conclusions

Basic microbiological techniques did not provide enough information for screening cases of ON in Angola. Therefore, the use of molecular biology or other techniques is warranted for this purpose.

Keywords

Conjunctival smears Gram stain Methylene blue stain Ophthalmia neonatorum screening Angola

Findings

Neonatal conjunctivitis, or ophthalmia neonatorum (ON), has been a major health problem for many centuries [1]. ON develops during the first month of life, and it was originally referred as conjunctivitis caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Now this term refers to any acute conjunctivitis (AC) developed in this age group, irrespective of the causative agent [2]. ON produced by sexually transmitted pathogens have declined as a result of the decreased prevalence of these infections as well as routine prenatal screenings [3]. ON occurred in 1% to 12% of newborns and it is a mild disease with the exception of N. gonorrhoeae[3]. Without prevention, ON occurs in 30% to 42% of infants exposed to N. gonorrhoeae and may progress to corneal ulceration [4]. Today, blindness from ON is rare in industrialized countries [1], although it is still a problem in many areas of developing countries [5].

In Angola, after 30 years of civil war, the health care system has serious deficiencies including the lack of systematic prophylaxis for ON. In 2009, Pastor and Alexandre reported that in one maternity ward in Luanda, Angola, 12.3% of the children presented with clinically diagnosed bilateral AC [6]. Microbiological examinations were not available and there was no information on the causative agents. Today, agents for ON include Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Haemophilus, and others in addition to N. gonorrhoea[2, 3]. Thus, effective treatment requires determining the causative agent.

In 2009, we started in Angola a project with the aim of developing a national programme for ON prophylaxis. Because access to microbiology techniques is complicated, we tried to provide the ophthalmologists the simplest tools to screen the pathogenesis of AC. Two simple and inexpensive staining techniques (ST), Gram and methylene blue (MB), were selected. Although they are unable to detect CT, they provide basic information about other potential ON agents. Thus, the purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical usefulness of the Gram and MB on conjunctival smears collected from newborns in a maternity ward in Luanda.

Patients, materials, and methods

The project was approved by Ethical Commission (Agostinho Neto University, Luanda). It was a prospective, non-interventional study including healthy newborns delivered at the Augusto N’ Gangula Hospital from March to June 2010. It was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Inclusion criteria were limited to those newborns having a gestational time of 37 to 40 weeks and birth weight of ≥ 2.300 kg whose mothers signed the informed consent.

Neonatal weight, Apgar score, delivery method, mother's age, ethnicity, residency, parity, prenatal care, and suspected or confirmed vaginal or urinary infections during pregnancy were recorded.

Samples were taken by the ophthalmologist, immediately after delivery, without using eyelid speculum and topical anaesthetics, with sterile swabs from the lower palpebral-conjunctival surface of both eyes. Each sample was smeared onto glass slides. Each slide was air-dried, fixed, and placed at room temperature. The slides were stored for a maximum of 3 weeks before shipping to the Department of Microbiology, Hospital Clinico Universitario, Valladolid, Spain, where they were stained with Gram and MB and analyzed by two microbiologists who examined at least 20 microscope fields per stain at × 1,000 and agree on the final result.

The presence of epithelial cells (EC), leukocytes, rods, cocci, and yeasts was assessed and rated per five microscope fields. Geno Quick® technique (Hain Lifescience, Nerhen, Germany) was used for CT- DNA in ten slides from newborns with clinical signs of AC (discharge, redness, conjunctiva, and eyelid swelling).

After taking the samples, all newborns were given an examination including pupil and light responses, eyelid, conjunctiva, cornea, iris, and lens transparency, and retinal red reflex (Brückner test).

Statistical analyses

Normality was checked (Lilliefords' approximation to Kolmogorov-Smirnov test). Weighted kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the agreement between eyes and ST. Differences between eyes and ST were analyzed by the equality of two-proportions test. The relationship between microbiological and neonatal-maternal characteristics was evaluated by Spearman's correlation coefficient and Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance. Statistical analyses were performed using R software [7] and package vcd [8]. The p values ≤ 0.05 were considered as significant.

Results

The data from 95 newborns and mothers were analyzed. Mother's age was 24.39 ± 6.29 years (range 15 to 42). Most of them, 55.7%, came from low socioeconomic neighbourhoods. Prenatal visits were 5.14 ± 2.5 (range 0 to 9), but 14 mothers had no medical attention before labour. Mean parity was 1.74 ± 1.78. Most births were vaginal (84.2%) and 15 cases were by caesarean delivery (15.7%). Fourteen mothers (14.7%) reported suspected or confirmed vulvo-vaginitis during pregnancy and 27 (28.4%) with urinary infection. Forty-eight newborns were male (54.6%) and 40 (45.5%) were females. In the seven cases, the sex of the newborns was not noted.

All newborns had normal pupil reflexes and Brückner test. Eleven (11.6%) had pathologic findings and five with signs of AC.

All Geno Quick® results were negative. Rods, cocci, and yeast cells were absent in all slides. Cases without EC (36.8%) were significantly higher with MB (p = 0.0002, Table 1). The percentage with at least ten EC was significantly higher with Gram (p < 0.0001, Table 1). There were no significant differences in the other EC groups. Leukocytes were rarely seen by either ST (Table 1), and there were no significant differences by any method. There was low to moderate agreement on the presence of EC and leukocytes between eyes and between ST (Table 2). Because no microbes were detected, there were no correlations with neonatal-maternal characteristics.
Table 1

Presence of epithelial cells and leukocytes in the cytological examination

Cell presence

Methylene blue stain

Gram stain

p value*

N

%

95% CI (%)

N

%

95% CI (%)

  

Lower limit

Upper limit

  

Lower limit

Upper limit

Epithelial cells

LE

None

35

36.8

27.35

47.41

12

12.6

6.98

21.41

0.0002

≤ 5

41

43.2

33.16

53.71

43

45.3

35.14

55.78

0.8839

6-9

14

14.7

8.58

23.83

12

12.6

6.98

21.41

0.8328

≥ 10

5

5.3

1.95

12.42

28

29.5

20.79

39.84

< 0.0001

RE

None

35

36.8

27.35

47.41

11

11.6

6.2

20.18

0.0001

≤ 5

39

41.1

31.21

51.63

28

29.5

20.79

39.84

0.1289

6-9

15

15.8

9.4

25.03

27

28.4

19.87

38.74

0.0545

≥ 10

6

6.3

2.59

13.77

29

30.5

21.71

40.94

< 0.0001

Leukocytes

LE

None

88

92.6

84.91

96.73

81

85.3

76.17

91.42

0.1651

≤ 5

5

5.3

1.95

12.42

11

11.6

6.2

20.18

0.1915

6-9

2

2.1

0.37

8.13

3

3.2

0.82

9.61

1.0000

≥ 10

0

0

0

4.84

0

0

0

4.84

 

RE

None

92

96.8

90.39

99.18

87

91.6

83.61

96.03

0.2140

≤ 5

2

2.1

0.37

8.13

3

3.2

0.82

9.61

1.0000

6-9

1

1.1

0.05

6.56

2

2.1

0.37

8.13

1.0000

≥ 10

0

0

0

4.84

3

3.2

0.82

9.61

0.2445

RE right eye; LE left eye; *Equality proportions test.

Table 2

Agreement between eyes and staining techniques

 

Concordance rate

Weighted kappa coefficient

N

%

95% CI of concordance rate

Kappa

95% CI of kappa

  

Lower limit

Upper limit

 

Lower limit

Upper limit

Methylene blue stain vs. Gram stain

Epithelial cells

LE

33

34.7

25.5

45.3

0.128

−0.0961

0.3516

RE

38

40.0

30.2

50.6

0.243

−0.0029

0.4882

Leukocytes

LE

83

87.4

78.6

93.0

0.412

0.3074

0.5167

RE

89

93.7

86.2

97.4

0.381

0.3097

0.4525

RE vs. LE

Epithelial cells

Methylene blue stain

61

64.2

53.7

73.7

0.524

0.2990

0.7495

Gram stain

36

37.9

28.3

48.5

0.174

−0.0543

0.4024

Leukocytes

Methylene blue stain

88

92.6

85

96.7

0.281

0.2104

0.3514

Gram stain

80

84.2

75

90.6

0.373

0.2673

0.4796

RE right eye; LE left eye. Concordance values can vary between 0 (no concordance) and 1 (perfect concordance). Moderate concordance was considered to be 0.4 to 0.5, and good concordance was considered to be ≥ 0.6.

Discussion

This is the first time that simple and affordable microbiological methods for ON screening have been assayed in a population of newborns in Luanda. This work has some limitations derived mainly from the lack of experience of the local ophthalmologists in performing clinical studies and collecting data in an appropriate form, but it can be considered as the first attempt to develop ophthalmic clinical research in Angola. Results are not tried to be generalized but to contribute to convince the health authorities to adopt some prophylactic measures to reduce the burden of ON.

Culture and real time-PCR techniques are currently considered the most accurate, but routine use of these technologies in Angola is not yet possible and the goal of this work was to determine if was possible to provide the on-site ophthalmologists with some easy-to-perform screening tools that are able to reveal the possible aetiology of ON. Gram and MB staining techniques were considered as appropriate options [9] to exclude most of the ON microorganisms. Although Giemsa is the first method used for CT infection, MB and Gram stains are technically less complicated and Giemsa lacks sensitivity in detecting sexually transmitted infections [10].

Gram and MB stainings are starting techniques for almost any microbiological study, although not all bacteria can be definitively classified due to the existence of Gram-variable and Gram-indeterminate groups. These include CT which is neither stained by Gram nor MB. Nevertheless, Gram stain has proven to be as effective as PCR, particularly with regards to gonorrhoea, at least for urethritis [11]. Negative results found in this study are probably derived from the different bio-burden of these two diseases.

MB, one of the simplest ST, lacks on differentiation among bacteria but helps microbiologists discern among rod-, spherical-, and spiral-shaped bacteria [12]. Results for both techniques, in this study, have been discouraging.

The presence of EC was used for comparing efficacy of both ST and to rule out the existence of technical problems when smears were taken [13]. Conjunctival leukocytes can be interpreted as an indirect sign of bacterial conjunctivitis, although they can be present in normal eyes [13, 14]. In our series 10% of cases showed leukocytes, although there was no clear relationship with clinical signs. Five cases showed clinical signs of AC, and only one case had leukocytes.

Conjunctival scraping is useful for AC diagnosis in children [15, 16] but it was not considered in this study because of its aggressiveness for the ocular surface. Nevertheless, it is possible that scraping was more efficient.

There was no correlation between clinical cases of AC and clinical parameters from the mother, although they are considered as risk factors [17]. Although the scarce number of samples was analyzed by PCR, no cases of CT were identified. While the incidence of ON due to CT in Angola is not known, the prevalence in Africa of ON due to N. gonorrhoea and CT is 50 per 1,000 newborns [1820]. Angola could be one of the countries with lowest prevalence of CT and it may be necessary to develop culture techniques suitable for Angolan environment for some of the causative agents of ON, although CT is a fastidious microorganism who needs sophisticated cell culture medium.

There are few recent papers on this topic. In one, from Togo [21], the authors found that 8% of AC cases are more frequent in newborns delivered via vagina and mostly associated to sexually transmitted infections. Staphylococcus aureus was present in 25% of cases. Authors suggested that educational efforts should be made in neonatal centres. The other was made in India [22], where the prevalence of ON was low (2,6%), although authors refer that rates varies from 0.5% to 33%. The commonest organism was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus.

In summary, although it is feasible for ophthalmologists to perform Gram and MB staining techniques on conjunctival smears, they do not provide etiological information; thus; the use of more sophisticated techniques is warranted.

Authors' information

IA is an ophthalmologist and professor of Ophthalmology department at the Agostinho Neto University Medical School, Luanda, Angola. She is also the academy director of the Instituto Oftalmologico Nacional de Angola, Luanda, Angola.NC is an ophthalmologist. During the project he was a resident in Ophthalmology department at the Hospital Clinico Universitario, Valladolid, Spain. MJ is a resident in Microbiology department at the Hospital Clinico Universitario, Valladolid, Spain. IF is a statistician and member of the CIBER-BBN, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain and the IOBA (Eye Institute) University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain. RO is a microbiologist and the head of the Microbiology Department at the Hospital Clinico Universitario, Valladolid, Spain.JCP is a full professor of Ophthalmology and the chairman at the Hospital Universitario de Valladolid, Spain. He is also the director of the IOBA (Eye Institute), University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.

Abbreviations

AC: 

Acute conjunctivitis

CT: 

Chlamydia trachomatis

EC: 

Epithelial cells

MB: 

Methylene blue stain

ON: 

Ophthalmia neonatorum

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

ST: 

Staining techniques: Gram and methylene blue.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would express their gratitude to Alda Rola, Alcina Copitule, and Walter Diogo Brás, ophthalmologists of the IONA (Instituto Oftalmologico Nacional de Angola), Luanda, Angola, for their contribution in the acquisition of data. We would also like to thank the Spanish Agency for International Cooperation and Development (AECID) of the Foreign Office Ministry for funding the project and the Ministry of Health of Angola for its cooperation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Instituto Oftalmológico Nacional de Angola, Ministerio de Saúde
(2)
Departamento de Oftalmología, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Agostinho Neto
(3)
Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clinico Universitario
(4)
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Hospital Clinico Universitario
(5)
Instituto de Oftalmobiología Aplicada (IOBA), University of Valladolid
(6)
CIBER-BBN, Instituto de Salud Carlos III

References

  1. Schaller UC, Klauss V: Is Credé's prophylaxis for ophthalmia neonatorum still valid? Bull World Health Organ 2001, 79: 262–263.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gul SS, Jamal M, Khan N: Ophthalmia neonatorum. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2010, 20: 595–598.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Recommendations for the prevention of neonatal ophthalmia Paediatr Child Health 2002, 7: 480–488.
  4. Forbes GB, Forbes GM: Silver nitrate and the eye of the newborn. Credé's contribution to preventive medicine. Am J Dis Child 1971, 121: 1–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ali Z, Khadije D, Elahe A, Mohammad M, Fateme Z, Narges Z: Prophylaxis of ophthalmia neonatorum comparison of betadine, erythromycin and no prophylaxis. J Trop Pediatr 2007, 53: 388–392.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Pastor JC, Alexandre I: Development of a national prophylactic program against neonatal conjunctivitis in Angola: pilot study. In ARVO 2009 Annual Meeting. Fort Lauderdale; 2009. 3–7 May 2009Google Scholar
  7. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria; 2012. URL . ISBN 3–900051–07–0 Accessed 2 July 2013 http://www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
  8. Meyer D, Zeileis A, Hornik K: VCD: visualizing categorical data. R Package Version 1; 2012:2–13. Accessed 2 July 2013 http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vcd/vcd.pdfGoogle Scholar
  9. Wu HM, Cordeiro SM, Harcourt BH, et al.: Accuracy of real-time PCR, Gram stain and culture for Streptococcus pneumoniae , Neisseria meningitidis and Haemophilus influenzae meningitis diagnosis. BMC Infect Dis 2013, 13: 26. doi:10.1186/1471–2334–13–26PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rafiei Tabatabaei S, Afjeiee SA, Fallah F, Tahami Zanjani N, Shiva F, Tavakkoly Fard A, Shamshiri AR, Karimi A: The use of polymerase chain reaction assay versus cell culture in detecting neonatal chlamydial conjunctivitis. Arch Iran Med 2012, 15: 171–175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. El-Gamal AH, Al-Otaibi SR, Alshamali A, Abdulrazzaq A, Najem N, Fouzan AA: Polymerase chain reaction is no better than Gram stain for diagnosis of gonococcal urethritis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2009, 75: 101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Abbott J: Clinical and microscopic diagnosis of vaginal yeast infection: a prospective analysis. Ann Emerg Med 1995, 25: 587–591.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Baron EJ, Thomson RB Jr: Specimen collection, transport and processing: bacteriology. In Manual of clinical microbiology, vol 1. 10th edition. Edited by: Versalovic J, Carroll KC, Jorgensen JH, Funke G, Landry ML, Warnock DW. Washington DC: ASM; 2011:242.Google Scholar
  14. Hingorani M, Metz D, Lightman SL: Characterisation of the normal conjunctival leukocyte population. Exp Eye Res 1997, 64: 905–912.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Batellier L, Liotet S: Comparative cytological study of conjunctival secretions and smears. J Fr Ophtalmol 1985, 8: 653–657.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Weiss A, Brinser JH, Nazar-Stewart V: Acute conjunctivitis in childhood. J Pediatr 1993, 122: 10–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. MacDonald N, Mailman T, Desai S: Gonococcal infections in newborns and in adolescents. Adv Exp Med Biol 2008, 609: 108–130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Foster A, Klauss V: Ophthalmia neonatorum in developing countries. N Engl J Med 1995, 332: 600–601.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Isenberg SJ, Apt L, Wood M: The influence of perinatal infective factors on ophthalmia neonatorum. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1996, 33: 185–188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Laga M, Nzanze H, Brunham RC, Ndinya-Achola JO, Maitha G, Ronald AR, D'Costa LJ, Bhullar VB, et al.: Epidemiology of ophthalmia neonatorum in Kenya. Lancet 1986, 328: 114–119.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ayena KD, Amedome KM, Diallo JW, Dzidzinyo KB, Azoumah KD, Aboubakari AS, Salou M, Koffi SK, Tchassi N, Balo KP: What remains today of neonatal conjunctivitis in prefecture of Kozah in Togo? J Fr Ophtalmol 2012, 35: 432–436.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wadhwani M, D’souza P, Jain R, Dutta R, Saili A, Singh A: Conjunctivitis in the newborn - a comparative study. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2011, 54: 254–257.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Alexandre et al.; licensee Springer. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.